NASA crashes spacecraft into asteroid. ZERO DEBRIS, ZERO DUST, ZILCH, NADA. Verdict: FAKE!

FAKE!!!!!!

Worst thread ever ! You do know they have medications that can help you now right ?

Bitrate is limited, it's like trying to use a dial up modem.

The craft "slowing down" in the last frames is called KEYFRAME INTERPOLATION, that can be easy-easy, easy-in, easy-out, but it looks shitty in the fake NASA broadcast because they tried to simulate a low framerate camera.

just answer the question.

are you saying that the Transmission requires a handshake?

Nasa = fake

I was always sure all the ridiculous money was going to underworld

i dont see how a rocket that has been travelling in that exact direction for so many years, why a tiny rock would have any kind of gravitational or other effect on anything rocket A is doing.

"I am not a crook."

Oh they used a cracker jack modem. My bad!

There is dust and debris you moron. There is no atmosphere so much of the debris and dust floats away in the trajectory it moves, dissipating quickly and doesn't condense into smoke or a cloud.
And we might have great cameras, but they're still not good enough to capture this debris at this distance.

It requires a handshake if you catch my drift.

The funniest part is the lack of stars in the background of NASA videos.

The official version is that "urban pollution" and "atmspheric distortion" prevents clear skies seen from Earth, but there's no pollution and no atmosphere in space, and every single NASA video is pitch black in the background.

But they will make you believe they can aim a telescope 300 gazillion years ago towards the big bang sweet spot.

Wow that actually makes sense, thanks.

So basically we are not seeing real images, only images updated
with whatever the processor considers a new part of the image.

If you want to lie, go ahead. I haven't banned anyone. Period!

I did answer the question. Do you know how to calculate a link budget?
Thread: Do you trust the Pluto images to be real? Here is what I don't. (Page 6)

cant stop a cinder block with a bb gun

Wrong. Do you want to try again? Tell me genius, why aren't there any stars in this picture?

Why am I able to get stars from the same exact location?


Last Edited by Astromut on 09/27/2022 12:38 PM

Demz kneeecgrowe hidden figgas beez in chaj uh dat!!! All dat maff ann siense dat knickguzz lurn did dat!!!!

The images are not "updated", just rendered.

It's a low poly 3D asteroid with a 3D camera aimed at it. Simple as that!!!

Nice "galaxy" render you got that. 3D simulations get better by the day.

As for the ISS picture, there are no stars around it.

Your point being is that you don't have a point. Only the same old tiresome excuses.

BHAHHAHAHAHA

ASTRO ROIDS LIKE HEMORRHOIDS

50 years ago Aldrin, Armstrong and Collins couldn't stop being shit-faced during the Apollo 11 press conference because they were told they would have to lie their asses off about "space" for the rest of their natural lives, or else their families [fill in the blank].



Fast forward 50 years, NASA "mission engineers" can't stop laughing, clapping, dancing, hugging each other and celebrating every hoax they elaborate.

So you have no explanation for why there are no stars in my ISS picture and you can't identify a nebula and think it's a galaxy. Maybe no one should listen to you when it comes to astrophotography. One is a short exposure of a bright daylit object, the other is the integration of hours of light during 5 minute long exposures.

Nebula, gas cloud, galaxy, Asgaard, Valhalla, who gives a shit, it's FAKE and everything you say it's straight out of the shill playbook.

Any 5 yo kid used to play last gen games in computers with graphic cards the size of TVs will laugh at you if you try to pull them your bullshit.

As for your "astrophotography" BS, it DOES NOT APPLY to binocular astronomy that has NO camera exposure.



No go ahead and say another crap that earns you the shill fail award of the week!!

So your claim is that every amateur and professional astronomer who captured this event is faking their images... and your evidence that this is a massive coordinated conspiracy between amateurs and professionals is...?


.



why NASA is editing photos to make it "fit" in the right "scale"

photo from their site was modified to make sure it fits the size that would corespond to focal lenght of the telescope and distance from asteroid. Why do they do it instead of explaining how the "oryginal photo was taken...


[link to i.postimg.cc (secure)]

Can you try explaining why it was pasted in to bigger black canvas?



.

Where did you come up with the billions of dollars quote? Do you know how much the project cost or are you just making number up? No disrespect intended, just curious if they really spend billions of our money on hitting a rock when people are hungry in America.

OK thats funny. It tkes a while for the pcs to get here, cant beat the speed of light with an image.

Lol. You know how much your country spends on the military yeah?

.



why NASA is editing photos to make it "fit" in the right "scale"

photo from their site was modified to make sure it fits the size that would corespond to focal lenght of the telescope and distance from asteroid. Why do they do it instead of explaining how the "oryginal photo was taken...


[link to i.postimg.cc (secure)]

Can you try explaining why it was pasted in to bigger black canvas?

Love the asteroid personally. Im doing my msc in space science so nerd out at this kinda stuff. Is it sad that I found that image exciting and get all the whooping and jumping up and down?

.

How much did it cost?
NASA has put the entire cost of the DART project at $US330 million ($487.5 million).

This is well below many of the space agency's most ambitious science missions.[quote/]

NASA says the DART project costs 330 million, you known it's a lie right off the bat because of the #33 magic pole flag remembering the fellow members who runs the show.

Giving the half-a-century history of NASA lies, you bet the "mission" budget is at least 3 times the amount they say it cost.

There's a reason why NASA logo is a forked snake tongue.

Never trust a lizard or men who work for lizards, specially these ones.