Moon totally on it's side right now

5 pages of shillery moon was definetly on its side.

I see it too brother every day, nothing is normal anymore and only a few seem to even care. the rest of the world just goes la-la-la-la.

Smh..

Yes, it was...
[link to imageshack.us]

God I love astro..

NO, fail (again) read again

the key word is "SEE" with own eyes on the sky, not some shit you keep posting from Apollolo rubbish as proof!

.

jeeeeeeeeez

THANK YOU!

In other words, you'll ignore any facts and evidence that show it's not a new phenomenon. Thanks for confirming what I said.

Thanks for proving you can do nothing to disprove that photo.

From nasa or apollo yes.

Dude you just wanna be right don't you astro? Attention everyone, astro is correct, that is all. Ego boost +1 for astro

It's up to you to prove the picture is a fake. Period. By the way, that's not the only one you must prove is a fake:

Through the Telescope. First edition. I've talked to Lee Keith myself, he confirmed it was a cheshire moon and that he took that picture from an altitude-azimuth telescope (the same manner in which you see the sky with your naked eye) in the mid-1980's.

Last Edited by Astromut on 01/17/2013 03:50 PM

I am right. I'm just rebumping the proof for any newcomers to your thread.

to disprove WHAT

imageshack?

Imageshack has nothing to do with it, that's just where I uploaded the photo. The same photo was published in this book 20 years ago:

It's up to you to prove that the photo is a fake as well as the other photo I just showed above from another book "Through the Telescope" taken by amateur astronomer Lee Keith.

that's something new - the proof is now youtube crap that someone cocked up


wow

Why does responsibility fall upon me to prove a picture you found from the 1980s is real or fake? I don't care if it's proven. It's just some picture you found in a book, how is it credible and how can you prove to me it is credible. No "why would he fake it".

And since when do we base our facts on opinions of amateur astronomers..

The proof is on youtube. Youtube itself has nothing to do with it. You seem to be highly confused. It's up to you to prove that "someone cocked" it up.

It's not an opinion, it's photographic proof.

imageshack, book on youtube, amateurs,.... impresive

and you're parroting somebody else here has to prove that all this rubbish (ONE picture in fact, more than 40 years old btw.) is fake. OMG

You have two options, you can either accept the evidence, or prove it is fake. Otherwise you have no logical or substantive reason to dismiss it out of hand.

He's an amateur astronomer, he has no reason to fake it. You don't get to assume he faked it. Well, you can, but to do so is irrational, illogical, and shows that there is no substantive reason behind your "beliefs."

the only one here confused is you, trying to use reverse logic, waving with that OLD photo as the proof.

pathetic, to say the least

I've now given you two pictures that are decades old when the claim was that this is a new phenomenon. It's up to you to prove those photos are fake. I've given you book references as well as photo and video proof that those pictures are real. If you wish to claim that I somehow faked those videos and photos of those pictures, it is up to you to prove your claim by actually getting off your ass, going to a library like I did, and examining those books for yourself. It's called doing actual research. I made it easy for you to see how wrong you are by putting it all online, but if you wish to claim that that evidence is fake, it's up to YOU to prove it.

Last Edited by Astromut on 01/17/2013 04:03 PM

That the photos are old proves the point, which you seem to have missed completely. And you call me pathetic...

This is your opinion. I accept the evidence and choose to disregard it based on source. I assume all is fake and everyone is lying, and prove to myself otherwise. Your picture just didn't do it for me, and no picture would. Get it?

If you got up and went to the library to prove this thread wrong you really need to get a fucking life bro. You seem to care alot more about it than I do and I started the thread.. I've said you were right multiple times you can stop shilling for discredibility now.

You said you would disregard NASA and Apollo based evidence. Now you have decided to automatically disregard evidence from amateur astronomers. When you get to the point that you assume amateur astronomers are lying to you, you're truly off the deep end to the point that you're beyond all help. Anyone who offers you evidence that contradicts your beliefs is simply "in on it" automatically.

Oh I get it alright, anyone who offers you evidence that contradicts your beliefs is simply "lying." Thank you for exposing your irrational belief system for all to see.

Your entire belief system is the opposite of science, you're supposed to try to disprove your beliefs, not assume anyone who produces evidence that contradicts your beliefs is lying. It's up to you to PROVE that they're lying. You have a fundamental misunderstanding of where the burden of proof lies.

I didn't say that YOU are pathetic but your explanations.
Well, obvious is that you have problem with your touchy ego.

You didn't give the proof of date of "your" famous launching pad photo.

I know about crescent moon and when it usually appears. What you think you're only adult here?

It's simply not this time of the year, yet!