Moon totally on it's side right now

Astro you still have not provided me with evidence.. Sing a different song and put your nasa photo album away.

Dude illustrated how easy it is to fake a picture of the moon with a piece of construction paper lmao.. How is your proof not biased

Need I say more?

I provided you with plenty of evidence. You are living in denial. It wasn't just from NASA either. Why are you lying?

Last Edited by Astromut on 01/18/2013 01:46 PM

I provided you with proof from amateur astronomer Lee Keith. It's up to you to either prove his photo a fake, or simply accept it.

Prove his photo isn't a piece of construction paper and your proof may hold some credibility, until then your not proving anything. That's like saying the sky is blue and pointing at my dogs asshole for proof.

Wrong, you're the one with the affirmative claim that it is a piece of construction paper. You either prove that claim or accept the photo.

That is a non-sequitur, which the photo is not.

Notice everyone how the OP now resorts to outright assuming that any evidence that contradicts his belief is completely fake, even evidence from amateur astronomers. Quite illustrative, isn't it?

Your providing evidence that can easily be manipulated and faked, as shown above, can hardly even distinguish the fake from your picture lmao. Just shut the fuck up astro if you can't prove your point leave this thread, or bring real proof that can't be faked. Why should I have to prove your evidence is credible, that responsibility falls upon you, which you can't do, because it's a picture. That's why you have no evidence astro. Kthx?

It is evidence from an amateur astronomer, a specific amateur astronomer. It is up to you to prove he is lying, or else there is no rational reason to automatically assume fakery until proven otherwise (meanwhile you assume waterbug is correct with no evidence at all).

I already proved my point, and I'm using you to continually demonstrate it.

You don't understand where the burden of proof is. It's a photo that was published decades ago, it's up to you to prove it's fake, not for me to prove it's "not fake." Yes, it's a picture, guess what, that's evidence! You don't get the luxury of declaring my evidence is "not credible" simply because you say so. It's evidence from an amateur astronomer with no motive to lie. The burden of proof is on you to prove it's fake, or else accept it.

Last Edited by Astromut on 01/18/2013 02:01 PM

God your cute.

[link to www.youtube.com]
[link to www.youtube.com]
Many GLP posts to the moon is different

How about give moon an uppercut 10/9/09
LCROSS Lunar Impact
NASAtelevision•

12/17/12 Ebb (a point of decline) /Flow (to move along)
NASA spacecraft crash into moon: deliberate collisions part of efforts to study lunar crust
JewishNewsOne

[link to www.youtube.com]
[link to www.wired.com]

9. Inverse Squaire Law . Stonehenge .. Mysner Effect (DVD 6, 32:37-39:40) HovindSeminarSet•


P.S. as OP can you not band certain posters? as it was done when
to the people that noted the Earth was tilted
Thread: The Earth Has Tilted!
and one must first do the investigation with links
as you will note that manipulation of information was also done then.

And for all the thousands of cheshire moon pics non go back further than 2008
as of today.

[link to www.artbrokerage.com]

Of course I can ban astro from this thread, his intentions are obvious, but also transparent for most on GLP, I never ban him from my threads because I like the people here to see him for what he is. Everyone looks up to the dude, I just like to show him to be the shill he is. I keep him on here as an example, what's funny is he thinks he has the upperhand, when in reality he's just a child playing into an adults game.

Just sit up. LOLOLoLoLOLOL

No, you can't ban me. You're not a star tard. This "shill" will be showing the moon from a polar aligned perspective to the public tomorrow at a sidewalk astronomy event. I'll be sure to get a good government check for my work I'm sure... Idiot.

Oh apparently I can't ban, didn't know. You sure do work hard to prove a point that won't affect you in any way whatsoever. For 5 days. It's almost like you just can't let the notion that the moon could even possibly be tilted get out

OMG

is this nonsense on automatic repetition?

Probably hotkey'd, f6 perhaps?

I enjoy debunking. Sue me. Oh wait, one if your fellow idiots already is!

No, because the initial claim was that the moon doesn't do this often. It's a logical fallacy to say you have to prove me wrong or I'm right.

[link to yourlogicalfallacyis.com]

This is the point I was getting at could not put it into words lol

You like people to think your right. Who's sueing you and for what?

Astro must've really made an ass out of himself to warrant all these people giving me support on a moontard thread, obvious shill is obvious?

That much is obvious.

Don't hate

How often is often one (1) (dubious) picture from 1970?

trying to use reverse logic, waving with that OLD photo as the proof.


[link to www.pa.msu.edu]

five days delayed launch
the fifth day it should be a waxing crescent moon
the picture makes it look like a 3 day moon ?

This historical album of Apollo 14 shows no moon?
over three solid shots?

[link to www.google.com]

I'm glad there are people willing to research this topic but we really beat it to death I think guys.

I believe Nasa. I think they are credible. Boom you found someone else.

How? And either way if it has to do with belief count me out cause I personally do not give nasa enough credit to let player 2 join in let alone direct my space exploration and my perception of space.

Last Edited by aliensbro on 01/18/2013 03:21 PM