"GREEN ENERGY" MYTH BUSTED - 50,000 tons of used wind turbine blades in the landfill | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 76810327 Denmark 01/13/2020 09:17 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Achduke7
User ID: 69637911 United States 01/13/2020 09:17 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Burying Plutonium is so much better, right OP? Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1051099 Lol burying used wind turbines is still 1000 times cleaner than burying used nuclear fuel you dummy wouldn't have to worry about it (plutonium storage) with a light water reactor, breeder reactor or better yet a Thorium fuel cycle!! Corporations will never do the right thing the first time other than making profits and the nuclear genie is too big to contain. Just use Fukushima as an example or any other nuclear power plant. Last Edited by Achduke7 on 01/13/2020 09:19 AM Achduke |
Butch DeFeo
User ID: 78321694 United States 01/13/2020 09:18 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | And those blades kill a lot of birds. Quoting: Butch DeFeo Time for someone to invent a machine to replace the turbine blade prop. Does Dyson need to build wind turbines? Maybe! Something on those lines. :DOCSRBAFFLED::redblueLED::DONTBEAPANDEMICS: Only you can stop the fake pandemic for yourself, no one will ever tell you the pandemic is over. It's time to WIN. |
Achduke7
User ID: 69637911 United States 01/13/2020 09:18 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Burying Plutonium is so much better, right OP? Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1051099 Lol burying used wind turbines is still 1000 times cleaner than burying used nuclear fuel you dummy wouldn't have to worry about it (plutonium storage) with a light water reactor, breeder reactor or better yet a Thorium fuel cycle!! at least the plutonium isn't leaking toxins into the soil like the epoxy wind blades (Dip-Shit!!) Do you mind if we store the nuclear waste in your yard? Achduke |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 78068184 01/13/2020 09:26 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Also the fact that these oil companies have almost a half million in various boats a day just in my area. Blasting the ocean floor with some of the stongest sonar. Scaring away most and most likely killing what is to small to escape. Stocks of sea life could plummet or decide to just not return to the area. What else could they be looking for on the sea floor. Maybe oil. Does anyone here trust the oil companies? No one is regulating or watching them. They have been breaking rules by towing the sonar at night and in state waters as it is. So we know they don't follow simple rules. They even have let them skirt some laws. Foreign boats aren't supposed to be doing what they are with out some sort of inspection of equipment. Ill get back to glp on that. I know of the person who wrote the article on it. |
Achduke7
User ID: 69637911 United States 01/13/2020 09:29 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Philly Special
User ID: 48696927 United States 01/13/2020 09:29 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Burying Plutonium is so much better, right OP? Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1051099 Lol burying used wind turbines is still 1000 times cleaner than burying used nuclear fuel you dummy Running water turbines in dams for 30 years is better Ignorant asshole Water turbnes are fully recyclable steel Much more durable Cheapest form of energy The correct engineering solution as PROVEN for over a century But.. .. that leaves no place for eco-fucks and their useless arts degrees... Water turbines is green energy you moron Yeah, it's great when a major river gets dammed so many times that it stops reaching the ocean. Also great when a new dam (like that one in China) floods an entire valley and ecosystem. I'm sure no animals were hurt in the process. To the OP: true story, it's cheaper to install a new wind turbine than fix an existing broken one, so that's what happens. Broken turbines stay there and new ones get built to replace them. |
rccola
User ID: 73963206 United States 01/13/2020 09:30 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | from link: Quoting: beeches The wind turbine blades are a toxic amalgam of unique composites, fiberglass, epoxy, polyvinyl chloride foam, polyethylene terephthalate foam, balsa wood, and polyurethane coatings. So, basically, there is just too much plastic-composite-epoxy crapola that isn’t worth recycling. Again, even though there are a few small recycling centers for wind turbine blades, it isn’t economical to do on a large scale. great pics and graphics at link! maybe we can build a federal pen for treasonists out of them..... Maybe they could be used as "slats" in the border wall!!!! |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 78068184 01/13/2020 09:34 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Burying Plutonium is so much better, right OP? Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1051099 Lol burying used wind turbines is still 1000 times cleaner than burying used nuclear fuel you dummy Running water turbines in dams for 30 years is better Ignorant asshole Water turbnes are fully recyclable steel Much more durable Cheapest form of energy The correct engineering solution as PROVEN for over a century But.. .. that leaves no place for eco-fucks and their useless arts degrees... Water turbines is green energy you moron Yeah, it's great when a major river gets dammed so many times that it stops reaching the ocean. Also great when a new dam (like that one in China) floods an entire valley and ecosystem. I'm sure no animals were hurt in the process. To the OP: true story, it's cheaper to install a new wind turbine than fix an existing broken one, so that's what happens. Broken turbines stay there and new ones get built to replace them. Your right on that. If hurricane comes through they could be wiped out. Trash on the seafloor. Money down the drain. No power for you. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 76811228 United States 01/13/2020 09:35 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Burying Plutonium is so much better, right OP? Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1051099 Lol burying used wind turbines is still 1000 times cleaner than burying used nuclear fuel you dummy wouldn't have to worry about it (plutonium storage) with a light water reactor, breeder reactor or better yet a Thorium fuel cycle!! Corporations will never do the right thing the first time other than making profits and the nuclear genie is too big to contain. Just use Fukushima as an example or any other nuclear power plant. you need to read up on it, before making uninformed statements! "Fukiingshame" was a 1950's design... Totally outdated!! |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 76811228 United States 01/13/2020 09:35 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | from link: Quoting: beeches The wind turbine blades are a toxic amalgam of unique composites, fiberglass, epoxy, polyvinyl chloride foam, polyethylene terephthalate foam, balsa wood, and polyurethane coatings. So, basically, there is just too much plastic-composite-epoxy crapola that isn’t worth recycling. Again, even though there are a few small recycling centers for wind turbine blades, it isn’t economical to do on a large scale. great pics and graphics at link! maybe we can build a federal pen for treasonists out of them..... Maybe they could be used as "slats" in the border wall!!!! |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 76811228 United States 01/13/2020 09:37 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Quoting: Achduke7 I built my own hydro plant in my (soon to be home) BoL. It generates enough for 10 normal houses. No fish is harmed(blades are designed for this purpose), blades are aluminum, so even when not good anymore, they will have no impact, fish reproduction is not affected at all, I only take like 10% of the stream flow to move the turbine. Smart use of technology! |
Achduke7
User ID: 69637911 United States 01/13/2020 09:38 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Burying Plutonium is so much better, right OP? Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1051099 Lol burying used wind turbines is still 1000 times cleaner than burying used nuclear fuel you dummy wouldn't have to worry about it (plutonium storage) with a light water reactor, breeder reactor or better yet a Thorium fuel cycle!! Corporations will never do the right thing the first time other than making profits and the nuclear genie is too big to contain. Just use Fukushima as an example or any other nuclear power plant. you need to read up on it, before making uninformed statements! "Fukiingshame" was a 1950's design... Totally outdated!! Ok which company or design is completely passive and knows how to handle nuclear waste? How do you know I am not informed? I have been studying nuclear and breeder reactors for 30 years on and off. Show me a passive design I can pull the plug on and not melt down or spew nuclear waste including the spent fuel onsite that would make money. Achduke |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 76811228 United States 01/13/2020 09:39 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 78341698 Sweden 01/13/2020 09:39 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Wayfaring Stranger
User ID: 76285781 Canada 01/13/2020 09:40 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | And those blades kill a lot of birds. Quoting: Butch DeFeo Time for someone to invent a machine to replace the turbine blade prop. It is the very tips that the birds cannot see. I'm pretty sure some 'ribbons on the tips' would solve that without taking away any of the performance. First the 'Who gives as shit attitude?' has to be removed. Last Edited by Wayfaring Stranger on 01/13/2020 09:42 AM |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 76811228 United States 01/13/2020 09:41 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Burying Plutonium is so much better, right OP? Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1051099 Lol burying used wind turbines is still 1000 times cleaner than burying used nuclear fuel you dummy wouldn't have to worry about it (plutonium storage) with a light water reactor, breeder reactor or better yet a Thorium fuel cycle!! at least the plutonium isn't leaking toxins into the soil like the epoxy wind blades (Dip-Shit!!) Do you mind if we store the nuclear waste in your yard? No need to, I will just re-use it in my homemade breeder reactor! |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 76811228 United States 01/13/2020 09:42 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Burying Plutonium is so much better, right OP? Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1051099 Lol burying used wind turbines is still 1000 times cleaner than burying used nuclear fuel you dummy wouldn't have to worry about it (plutonium storage) with a light water reactor, breeder reactor or better yet a Thorium fuel cycle!! at least the plutonium isn't leaking toxins into the soil like the epoxy wind blades (Dip-Shit!!) Do you mind if we store the nuclear waste in your yard? typical liberal!! just keep spewing out more talking point's instead of considering evidence based science!! |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 75758325 United States 01/13/2020 09:44 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | from link: Quoting: beeches The wind turbine blades are a toxic amalgam of unique composites, fiberglass, epoxy, polyvinyl chloride foam, polyethylene terephthalate foam, balsa wood, and polyurethane coatings. So, basically, there is just too much plastic-composite-epoxy crapola that isn’t worth recycling. Again, even though there are a few small recycling centers for wind turbine blades, it isn’t economical to do on a large scale. great pics and graphics at link! maybe we can build a federal pen for treasonists out of them..... Let's all pretend like our potential is limited and there isn't a way to recycle this stuff. Geez lmfao all you do is powderize the shit & mix it with an epoxy. Is everyone numb? |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 76811228 United States 01/13/2020 09:44 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | And those blades kill a lot of birds. Quoting: Butch DeFeo Time for someone to invent a machine to replace the turbine blade prop. It is the very tips that the birds cannot see. I'm pretty sure some 'ribbons on the tips' would solve that without taking away any of the performance. First the 'Who gives as shit attitude?' has to be removed. We can use all forms of energy generation, if placed in the right situation: Wind, Solar, Nuclear, Clean Gas, etc... |
Wayfaring Stranger
User ID: 76285781 Canada 01/13/2020 09:44 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Achduke7
User ID: 69637911 United States 01/13/2020 09:45 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 76811228 wouldn't have to worry about it (plutonium storage) with a light water reactor, breeder reactor or better yet a Thorium fuel cycle!! at least the plutonium isn't leaking toxins into the soil like the epoxy wind blades (Dip-Shit!!) Do you mind if we store the nuclear waste in your yard? No need to, I will just re-use it in my homemade breeder reactor! Did you know David Hahn? [link to en.wikipedia.org (secure)] Achduke |
Weyoun
User ID: 77989510 United States 01/13/2020 09:49 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Achduke7
User ID: 69637911 United States 01/13/2020 09:52 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Use the trench just east of Japan, it is so fucking deep nothing will ever escape from there. It is also going to keep getting deeper so all sorts of contaminated could be buried there. Would we know the difference from anything escaping from the trench and from Fukushima spewing for the next couple of hundred to thousand years? Achduke |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 76116759 Australia 01/13/2020 09:52 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Maybe when you build your power infrastructure with your sweat and tears it should stay in the public sector. Making enough to maintain and expand. Instead you drink the cool aid when the politicians want to privatise these community build resources. Like your schools, roads, hospitals, etc. But It’s always better in the private sector, right. More innovative and any other term the can use as propaganda to rob you. Problem with people is they just want to be big kids and not become educated, grow up and be a part of the system. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 78341987 United States 01/13/2020 09:53 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Burying Plutonium is so much better, right OP? Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1051099 Lol burying used wind turbines is still 1000 times cleaner than burying used nuclear fuel you dummy Plutonium is all natural. It came from the earth and to earth it returns. Just like organic beings. Yeah, but organic beings aren't dangerous for years after they are put back in the earth. Well, unless they are zombies... |
Achduke7
User ID: 69637911 United States 01/13/2020 09:54 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Burying Plutonium is so much better, right OP? Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1051099 Lol burying used wind turbines is still 1000 times cleaner than burying used nuclear fuel you dummy Plutonium is all natural. It came from the earth and to earth it returns. Just like organic beings. Plutonium is not generally found in nature. It is the by product of nuclear fission. [link to www.livescience.com (secure)] Last Edited by Achduke7 on 01/13/2020 09:54 AM Achduke |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 78225763 United States 01/13/2020 09:55 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | from link: Quoting: beeches The wind turbine blades are a toxic amalgam of unique composites, fiberglass, epoxy, polyvinyl chloride foam, polyethylene terephthalate foam, balsa wood, and polyurethane coatings. So, basically, there is just too much plastic-composite-epoxy crapola that isn’t worth recycling. Again, even though there are a few small recycling centers for wind turbine blades, it isn’t economical to do on a large scale. great pics and graphics at link! maybe we can build a federal pen for treasonists out of them..... Let's all pretend like our potential is limited and there isn't a way to recycle this stuff. Geez lmfao all you do is powderize the shit & mix it with an epoxy. Is everyone numb? |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 78117250 United Kingdom 01/13/2020 09:56 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Lance Roseman From BC
User ID: 45329550 Canada 01/13/2020 09:56 AM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Using hundreds of years old designs when there are actually very good designs for windmills (Hush turbines for example which was bought then shelved). But the 3 bladed monstrosities are simply stupid. No 'out of the box' thinking went into these things. J Mcanney has a decent but more local design. The hush turbine was bought by transworld international. I know I tried to get the manufacturing rights for the PNW and Turkey (long story). [link to peswiki.com (secure)] But Arthur was duped into selling his patent. There it sits idle. Once all the shelved things come out...people will be easily energy independent. But who wants that right? Meh... If you are not busy weaving your own magick, you are trapped in anothers spell. “It’s time you realized that you have something in you more powerful and miraculous than the things that affect you and make you dance like a puppet.” – Marcus Aurelius |