WW3 Europe front. UPDATE page 532 -February 2024, the decisive month

Some people are so rigid when their agenda blows up. I'm thankful for your thread here.

For every action there's a reaction

US Import Demand Is Dropping Off A Cliff (quite detailed)


[link to www.zerohedge.com (secure)]

There is still hope

https://twitter.com/_/status/1534174917264015365

Last Edited by Lago on 06/08/2022 02:47 PM

Rumba!

lago whats this spam bro are this some kind of coded message or you just think ure posting in other thread??

Its a coded message.

Please stop. It's annoying.

got something to say, say it. it's annoying

I understand you man. Sometimes the despair is so much that it makes you want to scream.

Stay strong, everything passes.

If you truly believe what you posted on here you would have refrained yer ego and get back to the most important thread on here.

Regards there dr as you and the C4T should just loose that what is important of what you think.

We on here need to keep up with the news of our world and you will realize at some point in our world as ego could be an inflated thing.

Just wake ta fuck up people on here, just wake ta fuck up.

DR, at least one of your posts has been removed. I assume you deleted it. I hope you will continue posting your analysis of the situation on your doorstep.

May God protect you.

DR, at least one of your posts has been removed. I assume you deleted it. I hope you will continue posting your analysis of the situation on your doorstep.

May God protect you.


We are waiting for updates. All info about war is frozen, economic crisis is deepening....how do you see the future?

bump?::

[link to en.topcor.ru (secure)] Is it possible to unite the Armed Forces of Ukraine and the Armed Forces of the Russian Federation into a single army, said Arestovich

Not about the ego. Never was.


Here is (and I will repeat this as much as I can) the WHY propaganda is bad, especially for the losing side (but it also be bad for the winning side as well) : if propaganda succeeds in painting an unrealistic view of the military situation in a war theater, the population (which is the basin for recruiting troops) will be willing the enroll in the army and go to a war that they BELIEVE that can be won.


That leads to a massive number of death and destruction that could be avoided, and the losing side will end up LOSING ANYWAY, but when the shooting stops (when the loser is defeated), the loss of land (hence, loss of economic power and geopolitical power) will be greater, because thew winner will ask, and GET, much more then if the war would have ended EARLIER.



If Ukraine would have not being helped by NATO, the war would have been over in about 3 weeks. Ukraine would have capitulated, would have accepted neutrality and federalization of the country, and would have lose just 4 regions (Donetsk, Lugansk, Herson and Zaporoje), but saving Odessa (and the sea access that they fucking need like air) and Kharkov (the industrial powerhouse), not to mention saving at least 100,000 Ukr soldiers lives.



Now, they will lose MUCH, MUCH MORE, they will lose Mykolaiv, Odessa, Kharkov and Dniepr regions...AT LEAST, and another 100,000 soldiers lives will be lost, not to mention the immense destruction if they hold on Kharkov, Odessa and Mykolaiv.



Russia, regardless of Western sanctions and help to Ukraine, will achieve it's goals quite fast, once the last line of defense of Ukraine is defeated : Slavyansk-Kramatorsk-Bakhmut.



Once those cities fall, Ukraine losses almost its entire army, and will be left with territorial defense units, which are basically old reservists and volunteers.



How long until this happens?


My estimate is roughly 6 weeks from today. Before August, or early August.

Op russia has cut the gas to Europe. Maybe the war is imminent?

War is inevitable, as for imminent, I don't see it yet.


As I said previously, unless the West does something really stupid, that forces Russia to strike outside Ukraine, war is "postponed" until China is ready for it.



I do not know how and when the direct (not via proxy) war will start, could be after China attacks Taiwan, engages the U.S. forces in the Pacific, then Russia strikes U.S. and U.K. targets in Europe, could be Russia doing the first strike, then China, could be both in the same time.



What I do know is that Russia doesn't need China to win a war in Europe, but it will take A LOT OF TIME and destruction (on both sides), and the victory could be a symbolic one, with Russia, Europe and the U.S. in ruins.


However, with China also in the war, they can win faster and avoid at least a massive destruction of involved countries, and the chances peace BEFORE nukes fly are much higher if both Russia and China are united vs. the U.S. (because NATO without the U.S. is irrelevant, and because the U.S. is actually THE TARGET, not Europe).



Can war be avoided?



Yes, it can, if there is a change in Washington's policy toward Russia, be it by replacing the entire political class, or Bidet & Co. realize that they will lose in the end, and choose to LOSE faster, but avoiding a nuclear war.

I think that if the gas cut-off will be permanent, the west won't have any other option than to go to war

The west has till October/November to defeat Russia. So they have to move now

I don't think China will make war unless they are attacked.

i think it's almost imminent at this point, no??? ppppprepare ! !