WW3 Europe front. UPDATE page 532 -February 2024, the decisive month

My opinion:
He is describing the same mechanics that makes colloidal silver work. Viruses have a negative electrical charge. Colloidal silver has an extra ion giving it a positive charge. This brings the two together. This attached silver molecule then disallows the virus from replicating, halting the spread of the disease. It's a mechanical process causing death of the virus. This is why viruses can never create a mutation that will escape the process, the process works just as well on the mutation.

Colloidal silver is made in a similar way to what is described in the video, he is just using copper instead of silver. A mild electric charge is what creates the ionic silver. I don't know anything about his "nanotechnology" process of heating the copper wire, or how that impacts the usefulness of his potion. I also have no idea if the particular process and materials he is describing are realistic or safe.

I recently ordered a SilverGen colloidal silver maker and will be using that for the duration. It's completely automated, just push the on switch and it turns itself off when the solution is finished.

I have read somewhere that some people use colloidal ionic gold instead of silver.

In any case, be sure to use ONLY distilled water WITHOUT ANY ADDED MINERALS, and .9999 pure silver (or gold) if making your own product.

Europe wants to block kaliningrad. Russia cannot consent. I don't know if they will choose to block gas and oil to Europe or a military action. The center of gravity of the war goes from the black sea to the Baltic sea.

WW3 maybe imminent.

The U.S. is the spearhead of globalist elites since 1947. Every single president was and is under their payroll since.


Exception : Trump.


And because he didn't was with them, he got removed. And won't come back, ever.

Please stop. It's annoying.

War is inevitable, as for imminent, I don't see it yet.


As I said previously, unless the West does something really stupid, that forces Russia to strike outside Ukraine, war is "postponed" until China is ready for it.



I do not know how and when the direct (not via proxy) war will start, could be after China attacks Taiwan, engages the U.S. forces in the Pacific, then Russia strikes U.S. and U.K. targets in Europe, could be Russia doing the first strike, then China, could be both in the same time.



What I do know is that Russia doesn't need China to win a war in Europe, but it will take A LOT OF TIME and destruction (on both sides), and the victory could be a symbolic one, with Russia, Europe and the U.S. in ruins.


However, with China also in the war, they can win faster and avoid at least a massive destruction of involved countries, and the chances peace BEFORE nukes fly are much higher if both Russia and China are united vs. the U.S. (because NATO without the U.S. is irrelevant, and because the U.S. is actually THE TARGET, not Europe).



Can war be avoided?



Yes, it can, if there is a change in Washington's policy toward Russia, be it by replacing the entire political class, or Bidet & Co. realize that they will lose in the end, and choose to LOSE faster, but avoiding a nuclear war.

DR, at least one of your posts has been removed. I assume you deleted it. I hope you will continue posting your analysis of the situation on your doorstep.

May God protect you.

Which one was it? I didn't notice anything.

Back on the sixth, the guys on the other thread don't like facts so they banned DR from their thread.

So DR made a short comment over here about it and then removed the comment a short time later.

The next several days come with a high risk of direct conflict between NATO and Russia.


The goal of the globalists was for Russia to be economically weakened and militarily weakened, working in tandem.


Ukraine MIGHT BE on the brink of falling, militarily.


Azovstal surrendering could be the first domino in a series of surrendering in several key garrisons (Marinka, Advivka, Sieverodonetsk, Lyman), which will trigger a general surrendering across the entire front.


If this will happen (I give it a good chance), get ready.


Hungary is not going to suicide by accepting the oil ban. While there is a chance that they can be forced, I think that time has passed, and Orban is not going to fold.


Turkey is going to veto Sweden into NATO, and possibly Finland as well. Turkey and Kurds are archenemies, and money is not going to convince Erdogan to forgo Sweden's love for PKK and their rejections of Turkey's requests.

But, as I said in my last update, Turkey have multiple options, and while I believe that they will veto Sweden, there are ways that they will just accept it.



What we are witnessing is a 3 month old propaganda that the West is united, NATO is stronger then ever, and Ukraine army is full of cyborgs and heroes, beating the Russians to a pulp 24/7, failing. HARD.


However, in reality, we are witnessing a weak West (Hungary opposing oil ban, Poland yelling and screaming like a little bitch "it's all or nothing!", Turkey veto Sweden and Ukraine facing a potential cascade of surrendering garrisons and possibly full capitulation or massive losses of territories and manpower.


NOT A GOOD TIME FOR THE GLOBALISTS.



Russia used a 200 years old military tactic. Ukraine and NATO fell for it. They faked attacks on multiple axes in North and North East, while grinding the Ukrainians in South and East.


Their demilitarization of Ukraine goal could never be achieved by multi-front attacks. But faking attacks on Kiev and Kharkov (and everything in between), they split the UKR army in multiple areas, where fights never passed the skirmish intensity, while slowly, but surely, grinding 500-600 UKR troops/day in the South and East with artillery.


Then they withdraw from the North...but not Kharkov. Doing this, they gave UKR the option to move some fresh troops to the meat grinder in South and East. And Russian artillery did its job.


Then they started to withdraw from Kharkov, and UKR sent more troops to the meat grinder.


In the process, Russia realized TWO MAJOR THINGS :

1.Formed a CONTINUOUS FRONT LINE in the South and East, where they now have ALL THEIR FORCES. The need to fake more attacks is over. Now Russia will SWEEP across Eastern Ukraine, and OF COURSE they will go back to Kharkov, but this time, they will GET IT, and not FAKING IT.

2.They killed 50-60,000 UKR troops, many being veterans, slowly but surely, while encircling multiple garrisons, numbering at least 20,000 more troops combined, all being the elite of UKR army, hardened in Dombass. The only serious garrison remaining will be Slavyansk-Kramatorsk one, which will surrender / retreat / be eliminated.



Me, personally, looking at this DISASTER on three fronts: European economic oil ban, NATO possibly forcing Turkey out or at least SHOW THE WORLD that they are not united if Turkey vetoes and the potential cascade surrender of mutiple UKR garrisons, I believe that there is a HIGH CHANGE that the globalists will start the war BEFORE all the above will happen or are about to happen.


Hang on to your seats people.


If we get past next 4-5 days, we're going to get a little bit more time before the inevitable, time that I strongly suggest to be spent by preparing even more.

Will the U.S. consider Ukraine important enough to enter open conflict against Russia?



We will see.

It's not. It's amazing.

And it's probably what keeps some posters coming back....

Yes

Think we are in cold war and US in some way has troops in Ukraine

They cannot leave Ukraine once they are there. I think Russia has slowed the offensive because they know that the moment Ukrainian army will be defeated, nato would enter Ukraine

The only way out for Russia would be to Ukraine to change side and to ally with Russia

Before becoming an accountant, I was a student in a military school in Romania. In my first year, I was sent to the office of a Colonel, which wasn't registered in the school ranks of superior officers.

That Colonel was the head of Information and Security. I was interviewed for about 20 minutes, and after this interview (which I am not going to talk what was about), I sustained a series of tests, for about 3 hours.
At the end of this, I was sent back to continue my normal activities.

After about a week, I was sent back to that Colonel office. He told me that my test results would grant me access to training in Counter Information. If I accept, I will start my training the next day. If not, everything will stop, and I will never be offered this chance again.
I accepted, and I started my training, which was exclusively theoretic. I became part of a team, that was trained in theoretical Counter Information scenarios, on a wide range of situation, most being militarily related, some being theoretical information gathering in foreign countries.

My job in that team was to gather all the information from my colleagues, and present options to a variety of scenarios.I was extremely gifted in this area (compile data and deliver options), and because of that, I was given access to former Warsaw Pact military doctrine, that was not in any military doctrine manuals. I have learned A LOT about scenarios regarding a military conventional conflict between Warsaw Pact and NATO. Did not have access to Russian nuclear doctrine. No country except Russia had this access.


This is was what I did before choosing a civilian path, and became an accountant.


Now, on the the meat of why I believe that we are just about to see a Russia vs NATO war.



Since I was trained in Counter Information, mainly in compiling data, I am pretty well versed in propaganda, both ways, but mainly in recognizing it, and more important, in understanding if it is propaganda or counter-propaganda, which is critical in delivering options to a military superior that uses those option and deciding on the lives of soldiers that he potentially have to sent, at some point in time, under specified conditions, in a certain area, to complete a mission.

The Warsaw Pact conventional military doctrine was always based on a simple FACT : We cannot win a conventional war against NATO, unless we use everything we have and can, outside military operations. We never ever considered any nuclear strikes, be it massive or punctual, regardless of wield, because that was not our job. Our job was to win a conventional war against NATO, without nukes, but using EVERYTHING else.

Russia, at this point in time, have a nuclear doctrine, that nobody knows it. Russia have at its helm a person that is a genius, and I will not present my reasons why I consider Putin a genius, because this alone requires an entire history of WHO Putin is, and how became what he is today.

The Ukraine invasion is not about Ukraine. The Ukraine invasion is the precursor of WW3. Not because people say that, not because Putin is crazy, not because whatever reason. But because of what happened, militarily, in the months before February 22nd.

I cannot present in detail my reasoning, firstly, because I do not know the structure of the units deployed in Ukraine, those that are still not in Ukraine, but waiting to enter (or go towards Baltic countries and Poland), I do not know the munition size and type, so I would absolutely be wrong in my assessment, and secondly, even with what I know, this would be the equivalent of a 20-25 person team presenting planning and options for a massive war, which will require hundreds of pages, and hundreds of man hour work for 20-24 people.

So, I will stick with the main points, and first is that Russia deployed a force that is absolutely overkill for Ukraine, no matter what. I believe that is obvious for everyone.
Secondly, Russia is using disinformation and deception better then anyone else. While every single army worth its salt will use the same disinformation and deception, Russian have mastered it. From fake retreats, to fake losses, to delivering false information through multiple channels, false information to be presented as a "win" or a "loss" by the enemy, to propaganda and counter propaganda, Russia is currently doing everything possible to win the coming war, conventionally, while having the back-up option to use limited nuclear strikes, for purpose of discouraging , or shocking, or achieving military supremacy in one geographical area and/or a specific military area, like naval or air superiority.

Thirdly, Russia is, apparently, having problems with logistics, especially fuel. Images with "Russian" tanks or APCs "stranded" in some field because lack of fuel are appearing all over internet, and are quickly grabbed by MSM and spammed on TV screens. Russia also lost a lot of hardware, from plans, to tanks, to trucks, etc., and also thousands of casualties. I am sure that they have casualties, I am sure that they lost hardware, but most of the hardware they lost, which we can "see" on videos, lack dead bodies. One would expect dozens of dead bodies when seeing a destroyed Russia convoy. Or would expect UKR to show dozens of prisoners from that "destroyed" Russian convoy. There are no destroyed Russian convoy, in the sense that they actually were destroyed by the enemy strikes. Those destroyed Russian convoys were EMPTY, and left on the road to be destroyed. This serve as great counter-propaganda, and presents a Russian military that can suffer losses at the hand of a much weaker army...and the conclusion is that NATO will mop up the floor with Russia in a conflict, if UKR can do the damage that they BELIEVED they did.

Next, is Russia being unable to conquer certain cities, like Odessa, Mariupol, Kharkiv, etc. Or unable to secure airfields with paratroopers. All these are deceptions. While indeed Russia wants minimal civilian casualties, which they MUST achieve, still doesn't explain why they "can't" secure some cities, unless there are multiple reasons for why they "can't". We know that Azov para and foreign mercs are especially in Odessa and Mariupol, but there is a seizable Azov in Kharkiv as well. I am not saying that Russia's plan will be flawless, because there is no such thing, and mostly because I do not know the structure and number of units deployed, and even if I can ballpark this...I have no idea what Putin and his generals planned for each front and each hour of conflict.

Russia is preparing this war for AT LEAST 10 years. It is a massive task. Not the war against Ukraine, that would take a couple weeks of planning. No, the war against NATO. While in my time there was no such think as cyber-war, I can easily account for, considering it similar with sabotages, but easier to do and with much more impact in the field. Sabotages have mostly psychological impact, but cyber have both. Still, I can account for them.

When preparing for such a war, one needs to KNOW, for sure, who their allies are, who their enemies are, and who will remain neutral / partly neutral / can switch sides / etc. The MASSIVE deception of last night (Kiev assault) was exactly to see WHO does WHAT. For example, Hungary was against sanction. Today, they aren't, and they support full SWIFT Russia disconnect. Bulgaria closed their airspace for Russia before the so-called failure of Kiev assault, but Romania only did it today, AFTER the "failed" Kiev assault. All this means something for Russia. Italy, Germany, Cyprus were also against SWIFT disconnect 2 days ago, but they did 180 yesterday, BEFORE Kiev "failed" assault. This means money was at play, or blackmail, or both. I don't know why they did an 180, but Russia KNOWS exactly why. Again, all this is information, and Russian planners are using it.

There are multiple more other reasons that prove that Russia vs Ukraine is just a simple task of securing YOUR BACK, before you face off NATO. Russia, either intended or not, is making it difficult. My money are 100% on Russia faking the difficulty, to EMBOLDEN their enemies feel like they can actually do some damage (Ukraine) or win (NATO). Using only a 3rd of their forces, Chechens brought in, Putin "ill", etc. etc., all of this was carefully planed in advance.

What is happening in the world, outside Ukraine, but related to Ukraine, points to a massive clash of superpowers, and I would be a fool to think that Russia didn't planned for that well in advance. It is by the book. If I didn't had my experience (even if it was limited, only 2 years) in Counter Information, and knowledge of Warsaw Pact military doctrine, I would believe that this is Putin's craziness, or his dream of Making Russia Great Again.

It is not.


The impeding war had to happen, because one side wants total control of the world (and this includes Russia, China and India), and the other side wants a REDEFINITION of spheres of influence (Russia and China mainly). Such goals cannot be achieved without war. There were multiple avenues that were taken to solve this redefinition of spheres of influence, but all have failed.

I do not know how the coming war will look like. I do not know who will win it. What I do know is that Russia and China are MUCH BETTER prepared for it then NATO. Europe is absolutely open for grabs. NATO forces here have no chance against Russia, conventionally speaking. It will be ugly, but Russia will come on top. On the Pacific, China will take Taiwan, and will stop there. I do not know where Russia will stop, because the doctrine to beat NATO implies a cvasitotal defeat in Europe, and this can be achieved two ways :

1. Wait until enough U.S. and NATO forces are in strike range, and obliterate them, causing massive casualties, which will instantly make MULTIPLE European countries to ask for ceasefire and peace talks, while in the same hitting the U.S. homeland bases, power grid, infrastructure using tactical nuclear strikes.
2. Strike decisively multiple European countries and the U.S., before there is enough NATO force on Eastern Europe.

Do not know what Russia decides to do. Do not know if NATO will strike first. I just don't know, and nobody knows that.

What I do believe to know will happen next, is tonight and tomorrow. Russia will show that all this crap about "they can't even fuel their tanks", "UKR army is killing them Russian by the thousands", etc. was nothing but a ruse to determine who are their friends, internationally, and to give a false hope to Ukraine and NATO that Russia is actually unable to do much, and clearly not to attack a NATO country.

Monday we could ALL wake up in a very, VERY different world, and highly possible that Russia vs NATO kinetic phase would have already started.

Turkey back to the western side

I don't see what could stop total war at this point

Russians have left snake island

This could mean two things
1- they are losing the war and are ready to sign a peace with Ukraine
2- following the Nato Madrid summit, Ukraine has lost importance for them and they are preparing for total war

Russians have left snake island

This could mean two things
1- they are losing the war and are ready to sign a peace with Ukraine
2- following the Nato Madrid summit, Ukraine has lost importance for them and they are preparing for total war