Godlike Productions - Discussion Forum
Users Online Now: 1,983 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 1,924,771
Pageviews Today: 2,843,942Threads Today: 777Posts Today: 16,171
11:11 PM


Rate this Thread

Absolute BS Crap Reasonable Nice Amazing
 

FLAT EARTH TARDS, EXPLAIN THIS PICTURE TO ME. I'LL WAIT.

 
ST37

User ID: 65606998
United States
10/23/2020 09:41 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: FLAT EARTH TARDS, EXPLAIN THIS PICTURE TO ME. I'LL WAIT.
Flat Tards explain this picture to me?

:jetairliner13:
 Quoting: Gucky


OMG that chemplane turned it's chemspray nozzles off!
PharaohChromium
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 77135687
United States
10/23/2020 09:41 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: FLAT EARTH TARDS, EXPLAIN THIS PICTURE TO ME. I'LL WAIT.
According to Nasa the earth rotates at 1000 mph. Every day, year in year, it rotates at this constant speed.

Imagine your location at midday is degree 66.6 on the equator on the 360 degree circle of earth. Everyday at midday your position would be degree 66.6

Now draw on a piece of paper the sun in the middle and the earth to its right. Your position at degree 66.6 is facing the sun hence it is daylight. Call this summer or June 6th for reference.

Now bearing in mind the rotational speed of earth is constant you will always be at degree 66.6 at midday no matter what day of the year it is.

Now zoom forward six months. According to Nasa the earth revolves around the sun and the time it takes to rotate is one earth year. On dec 6th if you draw the same picture with the sun in the middle the earth should now be on the left of the sun having made 180 degrees of journey over these six months.

The problem for NASA though is at midday Dec 6th the earth's rotation on its axis means the 66.6 degree position in now facing away from the sun and therefore it should be night. Yet all our observation and experience proves to us it is always daylight on the earth on dec 6th at the equator, year in and year out.

So NASA and other scientists are barefaced lying to you but what do you expect from an organisation founded by the Satanist Jack Parsons, Walt Disney, L. Ron fucking Hubbard and various Nazi scientists spirited over during operation Paperclip?

For those who question the motive of this deception the answer is very simple. The flat immovable non rotating earth with the sun, moon and stars revolving around the earth at the centre of Creation working like a clock to aid man in knowing the times and seasons proves the Bible is true and that there is a designer Creator and that your life does have meaning and purpose rather than the fantastical nihilistic notion that everything came out of nothing and that you are noting more than a random accident with an unknown cause and no purpose whatsoever.

Too many of you will deny this reality and even people like Richard Dawkins when probed will revert to some sort of intelligent creator as long as it's not God (simulation theory etc).

So globe earth shills answer my example above how it is possible with a constant rotation of the earth axis to have daylight at midday in winter and summer when the earth is facing the sun in summer and facing away from the sun in winter according to the NASA model if you can. I am eager to see the intellectual contortions you will come up for this solitary example out of many that you have been lied to since you were born. That is why in the Bible God tells us Satan has deceived the whole world, not a quarter, not a half but the whole world, get it?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 68834533


So you're also a Bible tard?
 Quoting: :TT:


So you can't answer the point?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 68834533


Dude, you're quoting a book written during a time when ppl thought you could see the future by blowing goats and that you could transfer your military prowess into your protégé by creampie-ing his asshole. Your fairytale narrative is the fucking hoax, not science.
 Quoting: :TT:


People are still blowing goats today. What’s your point?

Most of the architecture of history is so far advanced, that modern day technology can NOT replicate building them.

Hell, most houses built today can survive a stiff wind

Art & music from 2-300 years ago can NOT be replicated either
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 78104310
Canada
10/23/2020 09:42 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: FLAT EARTH TARDS, EXPLAIN THIS PICTURE TO ME. I'LL WAIT.
 Quoting: Lupe_Ate_My_Taco's


Well there you have it....forget what your lying eyes are telling you when looking at the flat world...you need to go to Louisiana to see the curve lmfao
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 68834533
United Kingdom
10/23/2020 09:44 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: FLAT EARTH TARDS, EXPLAIN THIS PICTURE TO ME. I'LL WAIT.
According to Nasa the earth rotates at 1000 mph. Every day, year in year, it rotates at this constant speed.

Imagine your location at midday is degree 66.6 on the equator on the 360 degree circle of earth. Everyday at midday your position would be degree 66.6

Now draw on a piece of paper the sun in the middle and the earth to its right. Your position at degree 66.6 is facing the sun hence it is daylight. Call this summer or June 6th for reference.

Now bearing in mind the rotational speed of earth is constant you will always be at degree 66.6 at midday no matter what day of the year it is.

Now zoom forward six months. According to Nasa the earth revolves around the sun and the time it takes to rotate is one earth year. On dec 6th if you draw the same picture with the sun in the middle the earth should now be on the left of the sun having made 180 degrees of journey over these six months.

The problem for NASA though is at midday Dec 6th the earth's rotation on its axis means the 66.6 degree position in now facing away from the sun and therefore it should be night. Yet all our observation and experience proves to us it is always daylight on the earth on dec 6th at the equator, year in and year out.

So NASA and other scientists are barefaced lying to you but what do you expect from an organisation founded by the Satanist Jack Parsons, Walt Disney, L. Ron fucking Hubbard and various Nazi scientists spirited over during operation Paperclip?

For those who question the motive of this deception the answer is very simple. The flat immovable non rotating earth with the sun, moon and stars revolving around the earth at the centre of Creation working like a clock to aid man in knowing the times and seasons proves the Bible is true and that there is a designer Creator and that your life does have meaning and purpose rather than the fantastical nihilistic notion that everything came out of nothing and that you are noting more than a random accident with an unknown cause and no purpose whatsoever.

Too many of you will deny this reality and even people like Richard Dawkins when probed will revert to some sort of intelligent creator as long as it's not God (simulation theory etc).

So globe earth shills answer my example above how it is possible with a constant rotation of the earth axis to have daylight at midday in winter and summer when the earth is facing the sun in summer and facing away from the sun in winter according to the NASA model if you can. I am eager to see the intellectual contortions you will come up for this solitary example out of many that you have been lied to since you were born. That is why in the Bible God tells us Satan has deceived the whole world, not a quarter, not a half but the whole world, get it?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 68834533


Damn, I've never thought about that.

Is there something bogus in this reasoning ? Anybody has an exaplanation ?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1011606



[link to youtu.be (secure)]
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 75921718


Ok thanks, I get it now :-)
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 1011606


So this actually proves my point. A full rotation is 360 degrees not 361 degrees. If we didn't artificially add 3 minutes 56 seconds to the actual time (or 1 degree per day) it takes to make a full rotation every day and therefore gain 12 hours in 6 months time 12pm on Dec 6 th would be actually be 12 am in reality without this adjustment.
Even the explanations of synodic versus sidereal days admit this. A constant full rotation is constant, 360 degrees of rotation is 360 degrees and not 361 degrees. Only adding 1 degree of rotation or 3 minutes 56 seconds is an artificial adjustment that is necessary else we would notice 12pm dec 6th at the equator would be night time for the earths supposed actual constant rotation.

It's only 12pm dec 6th and therefore daylight because we added 12 hours to the damn clock with an artificial 24 hour clock!
Lupe_Ate_My_Taco's

User ID: 78131002
United States
10/23/2020 09:56 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: FLAT EARTH TARDS, EXPLAIN THIS PICTURE TO ME. I'LL WAIT.
 Quoting: Lupe_Ate_My_Taco's


Well there you have it....forget what your lying eyes are telling you when looking at the flat world...you need to go to Louisiana to see the curve lmfao
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 78104310


I've driven across Lake Pontchartrain many times, ...... Flat Earth.
XRP & XLM

XRP = eXchange Rate Peg (Wholesale)
XLM = eXchange Liquidity Measure (Retail)

NESARA / GESARA
Lupe_Ate_My_Taco's

User ID: 78131002
United States
10/23/2020 09:58 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: FLAT EARTH TARDS, EXPLAIN THIS PICTURE TO ME. I'LL WAIT.
Flat Tards explain this picture to me?

:jetairliner13:
 Quoting: Gucky


The Moon's of Saturn are ....... inhabited?
XRP & XLM

XRP = eXchange Rate Peg (Wholesale)
XLM = eXchange Liquidity Measure (Retail)

NESARA / GESARA
Midnight Oil

User ID: 79322478
United States
10/23/2020 10:01 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: FLAT EARTH TARDS, EXPLAIN THIS PICTURE TO ME. I'LL WAIT.
I'm a bible tard and the earth is quite round I tell you.
ACTS 3:21
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 78173446
United States
10/23/2020 10:06 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: FLAT EARTH TARDS, EXPLAIN THIS PICTURE TO ME. I'LL WAIT.
I'm a bible tard and the earth is quite round I tell you.
 Quoting: Midnight Oil


Nothing round about it
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1298243
Netherlands
10/23/2020 10:07 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: FLAT EARTH TARDS, EXPLAIN THIS PICTURE TO ME. I'LL WAIT.
I'm a bible tard and the earth is quite round I tell you.
 Quoting: Midnight Oil


then this bitty bit about
joshua 10 verse 12 hasn,t glipped past you right??

Israel slew with the sword.

12 Then spake Joshua to the LORD in the day when the LORD delivered up the Amorites before the children of Israel, and he said in the sight of Israel, Sun, stand thou still upon Gibeon; and thou, Moon, in the valley of Ajalon.

13 And the sun stood still, and the moon stayed, until the people had avenged themselves upon their enemies. Is not this written in the book of Jasher? So the sun stood still in the midst of heaven, and hasted not to go down about a whole day.

14 And there was no day like that before it or after it, that the LORD hearkened unto the voice of a man: for the LORD fought for Israel.

not to mention the story about the tower of babel
wich even the Lord said that if people worked together and set their mind on they could make anything happen

how does that work on a ball hurtling tru space with a giant tower attached to it reaching heaven??

it works however on a geocentric plane..


im a christian as well as a bibletard and yes a flattard as well.

this is Gods terrarium,aquarium, aviary
and its confined..

hf
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 77585423
United States
10/23/2020 10:10 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: FLAT EARTH TARDS, EXPLAIN THIS PICTURE TO ME. I'LL WAIT.


Nice CGI/fake video, go back and try harder you round earth/ believe anything, demoncrap, Biden lover!!!!!!!!!!!!
MaybeTrollingUAgain

User ID: 79194158
Brazil
10/23/2020 10:22 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: FLAT EARTH TARDS, EXPLAIN THIS PICTURE TO ME. I'LL WAIT.
According to Nasa the earth rotates at 1000 mph. Every day, year in year, it rotates at this constant speed.

Imagine your location at midday is degree 66.6 on the equator on the 360 degree circle of earth. Everyday at midday your position would be degree 66.6

Now draw on a piece of paper the sun in the middle and the earth to its right. Your position at degree 66.6 is facing the sun hence it is daylight. Call this summer or June 6th for reference.

Now bearing in mind the rotational speed of earth is constant you will always be at degree 66.6 at midday no matter what day of the year it is.

Now zoom forward six months. According to Nasa the earth revolves around the sun and the time it takes to rotate is one earth year. On dec 6th if you draw the same picture with the sun in the middle the earth should now be on the left of the sun having made 180 degrees of journey over these six months.

The problem for NASA though is at midday Dec 6th the earth's rotation on its axis means the 66.6 degree position in now facing away from the sun and therefore it should be night. Yet all our observation and experience proves to us it is always daylight on the earth on dec 6th at the equator, year in and year out.

So NASA and other scientists are barefaced lying to you but what do you expect from an organisation founded by the Satanist Jack Parsons, Walt Disney, L. Ron fucking Hubbard and various Nazi scientists spirited over during operation Paperclip?

For those who question the motive of this deception the answer is very simple. The flat immovable non rotating earth with the sun, moon and stars revolving around the earth at the centre of Creation working like a clock to aid man in knowing the times and seasons proves the Bible is true and that there is a designer Creator and that your life does have meaning and purpose rather than the fantastical nihilistic notion that everything came out of nothing and that you are noting more than a random accident with an unknown cause and no purpose whatsoever.

Too many of you will deny this reality and even people like Richard Dawkins when probed will revert to some sort of intelligent creator as long as it's not God (simulation theory etc).

So globe earth shills answer my example above how it is possible with a constant rotation of the earth axis to have daylight at midday in winter and summer when the earth is facing the sun in summer and facing away from the sun in winter according to the NASA model if you can. I am eager to see the intellectual contortions you will come up for this solitary example out of many that you have been lied to since you were born. That is why in the Bible God tells us Satan has deceived the whole world, not a quarter, not a half but the whole world, get it?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 68834533


From the get-go, you start with a lot of assumptions, then plug in a false dilemma combined with a wrong perspective and missing/distorted information.
But you go further. You managed to turn crazy into even crazier with "creation" mixed in.

Its not as if your question doesn't have an answer, its a false premise based question.
MaybeTrollingUAgain
MaybeTrollingUAgain

User ID: 79194158
Brazil
10/23/2020 10:24 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: FLAT EARTH TARDS, EXPLAIN THIS PICTURE TO ME. I'LL WAIT.


Nice CGI/fake video, go back and try harder you round earth/ believe anything, demoncrap, Biden lover!!!!!!!!!!!!
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 77585423


Things be like:
Flerfer: Gime evidence!
*Shows evidence*
Flerfer: this is fake, just cuz.
MaybeTrollingUAgain
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 77156420
Australia
10/23/2020 10:26 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: FLAT EARTH TARDS, EXPLAIN THIS PICTURE TO ME. I'LL WAIT.
...


So you're also a Bible tard?
 Quoting: :TT:


So you can't answer the point?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 68834533


Dude, you're quoting a book written during a time when ppl thought you could see the future by blowing goats and that you could transfer your military prowess into your protégé by creampie-ing his asshole. Your fairytale narrative is the fucking hoax, not science.
 Quoting: :TT:


You've just proven you can't actually answer the conundrum I've pointed out in the NASA model by employing a pathetic ad hominem strawman.

Explain this obvious discrepancy, bet you can't.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 68834533



I can understand how you came to that conclusion, however, you came to that conclusion due to faulty logic.

You need to first understand what a synchronous orbit is. If you understand the physics of it then you will realise the flaw in your logic.

I'll give you a simple analogy.

Imagine yourself holding a taught rope which is tied to a metal pole, and where you are rotating around this pole. As you circle the pole, you are always facing the centre axis of rotation (the pole) due to the forces keeping you there (the rope).

Your orbit around the pole is said to be synchronous.

Now, imagine the rope is tied around your waist so you are able to turn as you circle the pole.

As long as your rotational speed (turning in a circle) is constant, you will always face the pole at the same time interval no matter what your position you happen to be at in the orbit around the pole.

That's about as clear as I can explain it in layman terms. I'm happy to detail the actual physics of it, and I think you would find it quite interesting too.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 79496395
Australia
10/23/2020 10:36 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: FLAT EARTH TARDS, EXPLAIN THIS PICTURE TO ME. I'LL WAIT.
One of the main things that made me question flat earth is that vertical is always vertical.

Da Vinci proved it with large panes of glass and telescopes, and defined the concepts of one-point and two-point perceptive. One of the straight edges on a drawing board is always vertical, and we draw the reality we observe; ie. all vertical elements are parallel, as far as we can see.

We draw what we observe, and still draw this way, and it is a completely flat plane concept.

This led me to question my entire career (3D modelling, GPS, BIM, infrastructure projects (rail, etc.), formulas and algorithms)... the funny thing is, our industry (all industries when you look into it) figure everything out "as if it was on an infinite plane", and then map our "results" to one of hundreds of round earth "representations" (geodetic's are "best guesses" to the shape of the earth, there is no correct definition of a round earth).

I do it daily (still do... but question what I am actually doing now), and never questioned it before.

The reality is, everything works on a flat plane, when observing, measurement or formulating. On the other hand EVERYTHING related to a round earth is "representational", always, and has to be "mapped" with distortion!!!

I can find ZERO observational proof (only questionable evidence) that the earth is round. In fact, the deeper I look into it, the more I find nothing but suppression and ridicule, which is usually indicative of a truth hidden from the masses.

It should be simple to PROVE the earth is round, without getting angry and throwing insults... shouldn't it?
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 78002069
United States
10/23/2020 10:36 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: FLAT EARTH TARDS, EXPLAIN THIS PICTURE TO ME. I'LL WAIT.
...


So you can't answer the point?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 68834533


Dude, you're quoting a book written during a time when ppl thought you could see the future by blowing goats and that you could transfer your military prowess into your protégé by creampie-ing his asshole. Your fairytale narrative is the fucking hoax, not science.
 Quoting: :TT:


You've just proven you can't actually answer the conundrum I've pointed out in the NASA model by employing a pathetic ad hominem strawman.

Explain this obvious discrepancy, bet you can't.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 68834533



I can understand how you came to that conclusion, however, you came to that conclusion due to faulty logic.

You need to first understand what a synchronous orbit is. If you understand the physics of it then you will realise the flaw in your logic.

I'll give you a simple analogy.

Imagine yourself holding a taught rope which is tied to a metal pole, and where you are rotating around this pole. As you circle the pole, you are always facing the centre axis of rotation (the pole) due to the forces keeping you there (the rope).

Your orbit around the pole is said to be synchronous.

Now, imagine the rope is tied around your waist so you are able to turn as you circle the pole.

As long as your rotational speed (turning in a circle) is constant, you will always face the pole at the same time interval no matter what your position you happen to be at in the orbit around the pole.

That's about as clear as I can explain it in layman terms. I'm happy to detail the actual physics of it, and I think you would find it quite interesting too.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 77156420


That analogy doesn’t invalidate the original point.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1298243
Netherlands
10/23/2020 10:44 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: FLAT EARTH TARDS, EXPLAIN THIS PICTURE TO ME. I'LL WAIT.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 68834533
United Kingdom
10/23/2020 10:53 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: FLAT EARTH TARDS, EXPLAIN THIS PICTURE TO ME. I'LL WAIT.
...


So you can't answer the point?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 68834533


Dude, you're quoting a book written during a time when ppl thought you could see the future by blowing goats and that you could transfer your military prowess into your protégé by creampie-ing his asshole. Your fairytale narrative is the fucking hoax, not science.
 Quoting: :TT:


You've just proven you can't actually answer the conundrum I've pointed out in the NASA model by employing a pathetic ad hominem strawman.

Explain this obvious discrepancy, bet you can't.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 68834533



I can understand how you came to that conclusion, however, you came to that conclusion due to faulty logic.

You need to first understand what a synchronous orbit is. If you understand the physics of it then you will realise the flaw in your logic.

I'll give you a simple analogy.

Imagine yourself holding a taught rope which is tied to a metal pole, and where you are rotating around this pole. As you circle the pole, you are always facing the centre axis of rotation (the pole) due to the forces keeping you there (the rope).

Your orbit around the pole is said to be synchronous.

Now, imagine the rope is tied around your waist so you are able to turn as you circle the pole.

As long as your rotational speed (turning in a circle) is constant, you will always face the pole at the same time interval no matter what your position you happen to be at in the orbit around the pole.

That's about as clear as I can explain it in layman terms. I'm happy to detail the actual physics of it, and I think you would find it quite interesting too.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 77156420


I understand what you are saying but if that were the case then there would be no need to compensate by adding 3 min 56 seconds to the actual rotational time of the earth would there? Happy to hear any further explanations you might have.
MaybeTrollingUAgain

User ID: 79194158
Brazil
10/23/2020 11:00 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: FLAT EARTH TARDS, EXPLAIN THIS PICTURE TO ME. I'LL WAIT.
...


Dude, you're quoting a book written during a time when ppl thought you could see the future by blowing goats and that you could transfer your military prowess into your protégé by creampie-ing his asshole. Your fairytale narrative is the fucking hoax, not science.
 Quoting: :TT:


You've just proven you can't actually answer the conundrum I've pointed out in the NASA model by employing a pathetic ad hominem strawman.

Explain this obvious discrepancy, bet you can't.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 68834533



I can understand how you came to that conclusion, however, you came to that conclusion due to faulty logic.

You need to first understand what a synchronous orbit is. If you understand the physics of it then you will realise the flaw in your logic.

I'll give you a simple analogy.

Imagine yourself holding a taught rope which is tied to a metal pole, and where you are rotating around this pole. As you circle the pole, you are always facing the centre axis of rotation (the pole) due to the forces keeping you there (the rope).

Your orbit around the pole is said to be synchronous.

Now, imagine the rope is tied around your waist so you are able to turn as you circle the pole.

As long as your rotational speed (turning in a circle) is constant, you will always face the pole at the same time interval no matter what your position you happen to be at in the orbit around the pole.

That's about as clear as I can explain it in layman terms. I'm happy to detail the actual physics of it, and I think you would find it quite interesting too.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 77156420


I understand what you are saying but if that were the case then there would be no need to compensate by adding 3 min 56 seconds to the actual rotational time of the earth would there? Happy to hear any further explanations you might have.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 68834533


Seems like you didn't understand as you think you did...
MaybeTrollingUAgain
TrulyOpenMind

User ID: 78881754
United States
10/23/2020 11:01 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: FLAT EARTH TARDS, EXPLAIN THIS PICTURE TO ME. I'LL WAIT.
If it curved that much the world would have a circumference of 5,000 miles.

Who posted this junk? Im not even a flat earther.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 75517704


badabing-sop
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 68572692
United States
10/23/2020 11:04 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: FLAT EARTH TARDS, EXPLAIN THIS PICTURE TO ME. I'LL WAIT.
Flat earth tards still can't explain why it is dark on the east coast and still light out on the west coast.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 68572692
United States
10/23/2020 11:07 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: FLAT EARTH TARDS, EXPLAIN THIS PICTURE TO ME. I'LL WAIT.
I live in New York and I am watching the 49ers play the Sunday Night Game. Why is it dark here, but they are playing in daylight? Was the game pre-recorded?
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 77156420
Australia
10/23/2020 11:43 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: FLAT EARTH TARDS, EXPLAIN THIS PICTURE TO ME. I'LL WAIT.
...


Dude, you're quoting a book written during a time when ppl thought you could see the future by blowing goats and that you could transfer your military prowess into your protégé by creampie-ing his asshole. Your fairytale narrative is the fucking hoax, not science.
 Quoting: :TT:


You've just proven you can't actually answer the conundrum I've pointed out in the NASA model by employing a pathetic ad hominem strawman.

Explain this obvious discrepancy, bet you can't.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 68834533



I can understand how you came to that conclusion, however, you came to that conclusion due to faulty logic.

You need to first understand what a synchronous orbit is. If you understand the physics of it then you will realise the flaw in your logic.

I'll give you a simple analogy.

Imagine yourself holding a taught rope which is tied to a metal pole, and where you are rotating around this pole. As you circle the pole, you are always facing the centre axis of rotation (the pole) due to the forces keeping you there (the rope).

Your orbit around the pole is said to be synchronous.

Now, imagine the rope is tied around your waist so you are able to turn as you circle the pole.

As long as your rotational speed (turning in a circle) is constant, you will always face the pole at the same time interval no matter what your position you happen to be at in the orbit around the pole.

That's about as clear as I can explain it in layman terms. I'm happy to detail the actual physics of it, and I think you would find it quite interesting too.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 77156420


I understand what you are saying but if that were the case then there would be no need to compensate by adding 3 min 56 seconds to the actual rotational time of the earth would there? Happy to hear any further explanations you might have.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 68834533



Unlike the analogy that I gave, the Earth's orbit around the Sun is actually quite complex, more so than what all but planetary physicists would actually come to realise.

There are regular forces that enact on the Earth's rotation and orbit, much like a complex timepiece. Each planet, their moons, our moon, all tug and pull on the Earth in a regular and predictable manor, like a complex orchestra.

As with life in general, the reality of a situation is often far more broad and complex than what is outright perceived. However, it's perfectly fine to see the small picture. The big picture is often only sought out of necessity... and sometimes by the curious! That's a worthy attribute to have too.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 68834533
United Kingdom
10/23/2020 11:43 AM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: FLAT EARTH TARDS, EXPLAIN THIS PICTURE TO ME. I'LL WAIT.
...


You've just proven you can't actually answer the conundrum I've pointed out in the NASA model by employing a pathetic ad hominem strawman.

Explain this obvious discrepancy, bet you can't.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 68834533



I can understand how you came to that conclusion, however, you came to that conclusion due to faulty logic.

You need to first understand what a synchronous orbit is. If you understand the physics of it then you will realise the flaw in your logic.

I'll give you a simple analogy.

Imagine yourself holding a taught rope which is tied to a metal pole, and where you are rotating around this pole. As you circle the pole, you are always facing the centre axis of rotation (the pole) due to the forces keeping you there (the rope).

Your orbit around the pole is said to be synchronous.

Now, imagine the rope is tied around your waist so you are able to turn as you circle the pole.

As long as your rotational speed (turning in a circle) is constant, you will always face the pole at the same time interval no matter what your position you happen to be at in the orbit around the pole.

That's about as clear as I can explain it in layman terms. I'm happy to detail the actual physics of it, and I think you would find it quite interesting too.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 77156420


I understand what you are saying but if that were the case then there would be no need to compensate by adding 3 min 56 seconds to the actual rotational time of the earth would there? Happy to hear any further explanations you might have.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 68834533


Seems like you didn't understand as you think you did...
 Quoting: MaybeTrollingUAgain


Seems like you're only here to dissemble and attack without actually addressing the points raised. If as this poster posted is the case then we would use the actual 23hr 56min 4 seconds to measure a day and not a 24hr one.
It's not beyond human with to work with a 23h 56min 4 sec clock.
I get it, you hate people who believe in God, that's your problem bucko, not mine.
ChefElvis

User ID: 13652864
United States
10/23/2020 11:54 AM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: FLAT EARTH TARDS, EXPLAIN THIS PICTURE TO ME. I'LL WAIT.
lmao
A legend in my own mind
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 77545963
United States
10/23/2020 12:06 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: FLAT EARTH TARDS, EXPLAIN THIS PICTURE TO ME. I'LL WAIT.
...


Well, above the equator, the further north you go, there is more daylight hours on June 6 than on Dec 6. In northern Canada, on June 6, there is daylight at 3:00 AM, until about 11:00 PM. If you go even further north, the sun doesn’t even set on June 6. On Dec 6, the sun doesn’t come up until about 9:30, and it starts getting dark at 2:00. Further north, the sun never rises on Dec 6

The opposite is true south of the equator. So daylight on June 6/Dec 6 at noon differs depending where on earth you are.

And while we’re on the subject, can you tell me what mechanics are involved in keeping the sun, moon and stars in rotation over the earth? Wires? Magnets?

And why can I see the tops of distant thunderhead clouds when the bottom part of the cloud is below the horizon?

And can you tell me why the earth’s shadow is round when it blots out the moon during an eclipse? And how exactly can there even be eclipses if both the sun and moon are whirling above a stationary earth below them?

And what would someone from Jupiter see looking up at their sky at the earth? Would they see a flat coin-shaped object? At what angle? The edge? Full on, like a pizza pie?
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 77545963


The opposite is not true south of the equator. There are not complete days of darkness in Antarctica.
The sun, moon, and stars stay in rotation over earth with original electromagnetic forces: no wires and magnets involved, other than the magnetic mountain at the pole.
The bottom of distant thunderclouds is not below the horizon; it’s only out of sight due to refraction near ground level.
The earth’s shadow doesn’t blot out the moon during an eclipse; that is a secondary body known as Raghu, the black sun.
Jupiter is an orb of light that circles above the earth: not a rocky body as modern science has made you believe. The sight from Jupiter would be like the top of a pizza.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 78002069


What scientists tell you Jupiter is rocks?
It’s a failed star.
All hydrogen and other gases.
Derp derp.
Go back to LARPING
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 78105935


Whatever. The point is that most planets are claimed by modern science to be rocky bodies when they are NOT.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 78002069


You are wrong. Most scientists do NOT claim most planets are rocky bodies. Thanks for playing though
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 78002069
United States
10/23/2020 12:08 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: FLAT EARTH TARDS, EXPLAIN THIS PICTURE TO ME. I'LL WAIT.
Flat earth tards still can't explain why it is dark on the east coast and still light out on the west coast.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 68572692


Sure they can. The sun revolves above the earth from east to west, so the sun moves on from the east coast and still lights up the west coast. How is that hard to comprehend?
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 72508799
United States
10/23/2020 12:09 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: FLAT EARTH TARDS, EXPLAIN THIS PICTURE TO ME. I'LL WAIT.
Could just be a bump or hill on the flat earth
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 79104722
United States
10/23/2020 12:17 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: FLAT EARTH TARDS, EXPLAIN THIS PICTURE TO ME. I'LL WAIT.


im gonna be honest, in that link, the little 23 second video looked like straight CGI
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 1480485
United States
10/23/2020 12:19 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: FLAT EARTH TARDS, EXPLAIN THIS PICTURE TO ME. I'LL WAIT.
For a simpleton both the globe and flat or pear are all theories.

When we can actually get regular Joes into space and they can take pictures of what we are on I will only then be convinced.

I just am not convinced with NASA or the recent FLAT Earth experiments.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 79104722
United States
10/23/2020 12:20 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: FLAT EARTH TARDS, EXPLAIN THIS PICTURE TO ME. I'LL WAIT.
Could just be a bump or hill on the flat earth
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 72508799


google lake pontchartrain in googlemaps

go to the bridge going all the way across

any picture you find from that bridge shows the lake perfectly straight

this pic and video in the OP is pure disinformation and lies





GLP