Notes from an "alternate universe": The Revelation of the Real World

Sometimes that is just what we pretend to do while we await the next compelling drama to unfold.

There is no need to figure out those things, including life.

Seeing what is useful in one's life and more of what can be used that is not yet a part of it may have far more benefit than understanding it.


I'm quite certain that you would not be the least bit interested in that :)

Well cue the fanfare cancel, after all my big announcement.

Someone should QueMe, I have 69 IQ.
Would someone CUE ME??? I JUST DONT KNOW WHAT TO DO!

Sin would just be forgetting your Self and the law of the Self (the 'Lord') like if you knew that you should not ______ but you did it anyway. You are not punished for this (as actual punishment cannot exist) but you may interpret reality differently than you would have otherwise.

'Adultery' has nothing to do with 'cheating' but having children with someone who doesn't share your culture and traditions, which work to diminish society and, thus, humanity as a whole. To adulterate your family is the only adultery.

There is nothing wrong with a married couple divorcing, as modern marriage is only a few hundred years old and was previously more about the union of families before, using one or more from each family as a proxy. Marriage is a human invention and has nothing to do with 'God'.

If divorcing someone is rational, that is a good thing. Something is only a 'sin' when a person cannot generally sustain it over long periods of time or, importantly, may cause you to forget your Self.


You are free to interpret reality in any way, but you will of course experience what is relative to your interpretations.

The golden rule doesn't restrict anything. It is just the most rational mode of behaviour considering reality. Step outside of this and it's easy to forget your Self.


Treat the other person how you wish to be treated, because they are you.

Everyone else is you, too, so it doesn't mean that you need to be with someone that you feel close to, or that you see yourself in.

The Bible is mostly about how the mind, the body, and reality work. (Most people see the stories rather than the meaning of those mnemontic devices, but I guess it's better than nothing.) The 'law' or Lord isn't about what someone can and cannot do, punishment, etc. That's up to each person to figure out for themselves.


For me, there are no creative or destructive parts. It might seem that way if I ignore the transition of focus, however. As I shift focus from one thing to the next, some things might seem to be destroyed and some created if I pay close attention to the logic of how that happens.

For me, I mostly just follow my sense and try to determine when emotions are pretending to be part of my sense as I expand and contract my focus.

So. It looks like the activity has diminished here and in that case I'll say something. I have decided to resurrect someone who died because of my evil doings. Though he has been buried, it is going to work like this. I do need sleep. I am tired. When I am awake, it is corrected. I commit all my power and life and soul into the Action. It is written here so witnesses can see. It will work how it should. I dont need to be rational. I am a homosaurian. I just am going to do it. It will somehow work out well. However. It might also be apocalypse. Because. Lots of dead resurrect at that time. That's okay. I have a stick and good night vision. Only I lied about the stick. Okay, thanks. Good night.

shucks. the builder has been still posting. my timing wasn't it. whtvr. :(

What Chaos will you sacrifice for a commensurate reward that reflects the difficulty of having done so?


When do you think you began to love Chaos, and why?

Wishing it when you really don't need it would make it exponentially worse, perhaps.

What success do you see before you?


if you happen to go for a walk sometime soon, feel free to talk to yourself about it and be open to speaking for your inner Genius.

Good question. I’ve already sacrificed music and concerts. Which was actually easier than I thought. I’ll have to think about that one.



If I had to guess, I’d say around the age of 15 when I started to go see the Grateful Dead and take acid. For the first time in my life, I felt like I was with my people. I always felt like an outsider in my own family. I was different than them - and they always commented on it too.

The Dead felt like my family as the years ticked on. It’s how I met my friends and eventually my husband. Music and dance was such an integral part of my life for many, many years.

It gave me a sense of belonging and a glimpse into an entirely different way of life compared to how I was raised. It was enticing. Walking the lot, being in the show - I felt so alive.

I haven’t gotten that far in my thinking to be honest. Success for me right now is selling the house and relocating somewhere outside of California so I can begin to think about building myself in a new way. What job will I have? Where will I live? Making new friends. Being closer to my family. Those types of things.


I will make that happen this week. All I do is talk to myself when I walk. Last year I was walking 3x week, this year I’ve been having a hard time motivating and am lucky to get one walk in a week. My poor dogs.

It’s like all the things I know are good for my soul, I’m having a hard time doing. Why is that? It then makes me get down on myself.

I’ve certainly noticed some interesting influences of these relationships lately
.
My son is very into scary things right now. He begged and begged for the biggest, scariest Halloween decorations this year. I have a soft spot for most ‘scary’ but this is like evil clown stuff that I would never ever bring into my house if I weren’t such a sucker for my son’s requests.
So now my entry vestibule is filled with these terrifying vignettes as we wait a little bit longer to put them outside so they will survive until Halloween.
And here’s the thing, I have never really liked the ‘energy’ or whatever you want to call it in that part of the house - everyone always kind of bickers as they rush through there to get in or out - but now it is suddenly a lot better somehow.

I could make up all kind of stories about how the scary stuff is scaring away the bad energy etc but I don’t really feel the need to explain it. Something has very clearly changed though. Now, if only I can figure out how to hold on to some of
the new relationships without keeping killer clowns there year round!







There is also a painting in the same auction that reminded me of your history of the word ‘toilette’:
[link to www.sothebys.com (secure)]

I assume the second name is given as an alternative because some wouldn’t want to purchase an item called ‘a women in her toilet’ given the current feelings on the word.
In our context here, I have to wonder about possible obfuscations of her complexion or what might be in those products she is using but really I just find her to be very sweet :).

The classic crime.

The lyriks are excellent however the site doesn't allow posting copywritten lyriks. SHUCKS motherfuckers.

In the blood wars site it is written that the Homosaurians are the ones who 'invented the racism narrative'.

OF course I would like to contribute an important clarification of what this means. It doesn't mean Homosaurians invented RACISM.

They invented the NARRATIVE that racism is WRONG (heh).

LET'S EXAMINE A BEAUTIFUL EXAMPLE OF HOW JESUS OF NAZARETH IS A RACIST MAN:

MATTHEW CHAPTER 15 - VERSES LISTED BELOW


21 Then Jesus went thence, and departed into the coasts of Tyre and Sidon.

22 And, behold, a woman of Canaan came out of the same coasts, and cried unto him, saying, Have mercy on me, O Lord, thou Son of David; my daughter is grievously vexed with a devil.

23 But he answered her not a word. And his disciples came and besought him, saying, Send her away; for she crieth after us.

24 But he answered and said, I am not sent but unto the lost sheep of the house of Israel.

25 Then came she and worshipped him, saying, Lord, help me.

26 But he answered and said, It is not meet to take the children's bread, and to cast it to dogs.

27 And she said, Truth, Lord: yet the dogs eat of the crumbs which fall from their masters' table.

28 Then Jesus answered and said unto her, O woman, great is thy faith: be it unto thee even as thou wilt. And her daughter was made whole from that very hour.

29 And Jesus departed from thence, and came nigh unto the sea of Galilee; and went up into a mountain, and sat down there.

HE CALLS THE WOMAN A DOG! SHE ACCEPTS THE COMPARISON. ONLY THEN DOES HE HEAL HER. WHAT DOES THIS MEAN?

IT MEANS THE MERCY OF JESUS WAS ONLY ACCESSIBLE TO HER FROM ACCEPTING HER PLACE AS INFERIOR IN RACE.

WHAT DOES IT MEAN THAT JESUS ONLY HAD COME FOR THE LOST SHEEP OF ISRAEL?

IT MEANS HE CAME TO FULFILL THE LAW (SEE MALACHI)

IT MEANS WHOEVER WANTS TO HAVE THE MERCY OF JESUS ONLY HAS A CHANCE, NO GUARANTEE.

AND

SHOULD BECOME A J-E-W

PROBABLY

Otherwise who do you think you're fooling. God?

@The-Builder

What is your opinion on why the Homosaurian humans are so obsessed with rationality?

Additional question - does it seem to you, also, that the Homosapien humans are obsessed with irrationality?

Further question - does it KINDA seem like they EACH are obssessed with EACH OTHERS aspects that OF THEMSELVES are not especially PROUD OF?

Your statement is rife with irony.

Ironic hypocrisy is the funniest shit!

But I'll tell you something i see myself more as responsible for being myself. Unfortunately i don't always know where I'm going! Sometimes people follow me.

In terms of actual influence there's little i can say. It is who I am that makes the difference.

My words don't matter as much as you think. However there are some people where even a single syllable is so sacred that even "thinking" the sound on their throat produces an impact.

As is by design I have some useful things the share about this effect, simply because I am more conscious of it, while those who have this power might not be conscious of it.

I have my unconscious aspect too, and found guidance about it. I get scared because not only do I not know where I'm going, I have people with me.

That's difficult. Nevertheless I must move forward regardless of a dream cloud hovering in the past.

Being myself is the hardest thing? Well then it isn't hard at all! So, nothing is hard.

Life's easy.

Now can you see how desperately I have wished to have the power of words to influence others to higher joys in life?

Instead I can only offer my example of who I am right here right now.

I recorded two piano singing videos in a short time.

Here's one below. You can follow the links to see the one recorded before it. You can see they are different. These are different versions of the same songs. Same lyrics different chord progressions. Different songs. Different meanings.




Can you trust my unconscious? I don't know where I'm going and I've got no direction. There is no direction. Space is one thing. Time is the momentum of moments one of another.

And we see a story moment to moment. This is the spirit of it. So is the music in between the notes.

My spirit in between my movements.

I would say don't follow me but it's not up to me.

You know it.

I presume you all ready know the answer but you're thinking about how difficult a sacrifice it would be and how you 'cannot' do that.

A strong, yet secret desire for something masquerading as an inability to let it go is one of my brain's most favourite tricks.


What do you think you might have been trying to push away, or ignore, since then?

You left home, and then you left your home.

Please refer to the above.

If it is, then it is.

If it is not time to let go, then one would hesitate. The more one does, the more one is not yet ready. The hesitation hints at desire, and the desire is self-conditioned.

How to un-condition?

If I may point out some ways that your reality may be built in detrimental ways using language, in direct communication with the Self:

"It's hard to see a way through it"
"I'm spent"
"Once it sells, everything about me is up in the air."
"Thinking about it, I suppose may be I'm not doing any thing correctly"
"I’m struggling with negative self talk right now. "
"I’m failing miserably"
"I’m struggling a bit now..."
"Focused on my house."

The more you say these things of things the more you want to focus on and around them, which will unfold into experience. Continue saying the same things and it will be so. We interpret reality through language, and this kind of dialogue with ourselves shows how we want to interpret.

It is easy to think that those things are reality because it may be felt. But feelings are not reality. Feelings are just made up. The Self doesn't care how you feel, but what you do (which includes what you say to it).

Just my 2 senses.

[Emphasis mind]

Think about why you may want to have a hard time doing the things that you know are good for your soul.

If it's difficult to do something that isn't really, it's because we don't actually want to do it.

Just because it is 'good' or we think it is does not mean that we would choose that automatically. We often WANT and choose what is not 'good' for us.

But, of course, our brains will tell us that we do want those good things, in order to continue that particular drama.

So, you're basically telling yourself that you desire to have a hard time. Find out why.

[Mind your mind]

Now consider that your son may be aware of the 'protective' effects of these kinds of things (i.e., controlled 'evil' warding off uncontrolled 'evil') and has unfolded a logical narrative that seems like something else entirely.

Now apply that to everything else.

Our choices making reality fold and unfold endlessly.


Her tone would have been considered 'very fair complexioned' at the time and doesn't appear to be modified.

For example, the Earl of Dalkeith Sir James Scott, grandson of Charles II of England, Scotland and Ireland, was described as being "very fair complexioned" in a compilation of notes written for Sophia of Hanover c. 1700 to characterise the nobles of England and Scotland, and other persons of distinction, published in 1733 as, "Memoirs of the Secret Services of John Macky".

[for your reference, see page 263 of the book at archive - dot -org per the that website's number system]

Compare that with his Wikipedia portrait at [link to en.wikipedia.org (secure)]

However, Charles Seymour, 6th Duke of Somerset, was described as having "a very Black complexion". [page 72 in the book, per the website's numbering]

Compare that with his portrait on Wikipedia here: [link to en.wikipedia.org (secure)]

Happy October!

Other replies to come, probably, been lurking, but wanted to welcome the autumn and ask your thoughts on the spookiness of the season.

Lots of (often conflicting) information abound concerning what autumn is all about physically and spiritually, what's your take?

I love autumn. Which means something, I'm sure :)

I just noticed the 'very brown' complexion of his page, to the right of the painting. Pages were usually distant relatives from other houses who would later become knights in service to the king or queen. They were, themselves, minor nobility and not just the general public (who were not really trusted).

This lends to the narrative that those with very dark complexions were only servants, so it makes sense that this part of the painting was not modified. As the boy grew into a knight or landed gentry, he would have commissioned his own portrait showing himself as either fair-skinned or as dark as he was (depending on the politics at the time, and taste; sometimes they did both portraits). If the latter it would have either been painted over to alter his complexion in the late 1800's to early 1900's or destroyed altogether by the likes of Cromwell.

When many copies of an inconvenient portrait were in circulation (such as in the popular book Leviathan from 1651 showing a plate of King Charles I of England, Scotland, and Ireland, looking rather dark) then it was resolved by re-printing the book with a different plate.

If a book that describes a particular painting did not correlate with the painting itself, the book was no longer referenced. One of many examples of this is the portrait of Charles, 1st Duke of Richmond, son of King Charles II, described in Anecdotes of Painting in England (1826) as "Charles Lennox, Duke of Richmond: A black boy holding his hat and feather" when the painting shows a 'fair-skinned' boy holding his hat and feather.

Spookiness? I'm not sure what you're referencing.


At this point no other information really matters. We have all of that which we need to make rational decisions and carry them out.

The most important information could be one's choice to never harm oneself again.

In these times, there will be many who simply lose their minds.

Mind your mind.

Halloween, All Hallows Eve, something something about the veil between worlds becoming thin as the world actively dies to go dormant before being born anew in spring. Spooky stuff



The only way to never harm oneself again would be to make the very idea of "harm" entirely irrelevant, I think. Elsewise 'harm' could be interpreted as being done to some aspect of oneself no matter the decision

No, no relevance. Just an other way to instil fear in children and make money in the process.


Perhaps a better, more efficient way would simply be to not choose it.

A lot if it has been around the need to under-stand.

I thought I needed to under-stand everything, by experiencing it first hand.

I can see by telling myself that I’m certainly lying to myself.

Hmm.