| Users Online Now: 1,331 (Who's On?) | Visitors Today: 294,401 | |
| Pageviews Today: 371,669 | Threads Today: 67 | Posts Today: 1,100 |
| 03:19 AM | ||
| Users Online Now: 1,331 (Who's On?) | Visitors Today: 294,401 | |
| Pageviews Today: 371,669 | Threads Today: 67 | Posts Today: 1,100 |
| 03:19 AM | ||
NEW: Ivermectin doesn’t prevent severe disease from Covid-19 any more effectively than a placebo, according to a new study published in JAMA | |
Turd Ferguson, Jr.
 User ID: 51522520  United States02/19/2022 01:12 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 79771246 United States02/19/2022 01:13 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: NEW: Ivermectin doesn’t prevent severe disease from Covid-19 any more effectively than a placebo, according to a new study published in JAMA The antiparasitic drug ivermectin doesn't prevent severe disease from COVID-19 any more effectively than symptom management and close observation by medical professionals, according to a study published Friday in the journal JAMA Internal Medicine. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 80683312 The study enrolled nearly 500 people 50 and older who were at risk of severe COVID-19 because of their age and underlying health. These patients were treated at 20 public hospitals and a quarantine center in Malaysia in 2021. Half of the patients took a relatively high dose of oral ivermectin for five days, and the other half — the comparison group — received treatment for their symptoms, such as fever-reducing medications. All were monitored for progression of the disease. There was no difference in outcomes between the groups. In fact, slightly more patients in the ivermectin group went on to need extra oxygen compared with those who took a placebo, though the difference was not statistically significant. This was the main outcome researchers studied, but they also looked at whether patients needed to be hospitalized, had to go on a ventilator, needed intensive care or died from their infections. There was no meaningful difference in outcomes between the group that took ivermectin and those who got the placebo treatment. [link to www.wesh.com (secure)] Somebody please help the idiot who posted this....please |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 80290761 United States02/19/2022 01:13 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: NEW: Ivermectin doesn’t prevent severe disease from Covid-19 any more effectively than a placebo, according to a new study published in JAMA The antiparasitic drug ivermectin doesn't prevent severe disease from COVID-19 any more effectively than symptom management and close observation by medical professionals, according to a study published Friday in the journal JAMA Internal Medicine. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 80683312 The study enrolled nearly 500 people 50 and older who were at risk of severe COVID-19 because of their age and underlying health. These patients were treated at 20 public hospitals and a quarantine center in Malaysia in 2021. Half of the patients took a relatively high dose of oral ivermectin for five days, and the other half — the comparison group — received treatment for their symptoms, such as fever-reducing medications. All were monitored for progression of the disease. There was no difference in outcomes between the groups. In fact, slightly more patients in the ivermectin group went on to need extra oxygen compared with those who took a placebo, though the difference was not statistically significant. This was the main outcome researchers studied, but they also looked at whether patients needed to be hospitalized, had to go on a ventilator, needed intensive care or died from their infections. There was no meaningful difference in outcomes between the group that took ivermectin and those who got the placebo treatment. [link to www.wesh.com (secure)] Disinformation ^^^ |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 82208951 02/19/2022 01:13 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: NEW: Ivermectin doesn’t prevent severe disease from Covid-19 any more effectively than a placebo, according to a new study published in JAMA What a convincing rebuttal of the findings from this large scale randomized clinical trial. I’ll be you did your own research. Yes! We have already proven you CAN TRUST pharmaceutical companies and scientists!! So? Have some rem death IV air! And some My daze at all! How about a random study on that?! Ivermectin has been safely consumed by millions of people for 40 years!! So it’s “perfect” for testing! Go shoot a ashy rabbit! Pretend to?! |
| BeetusTech
User ID: 80060400 United States02/19/2022 01:20 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: NEW: Ivermectin doesn’t prevent severe disease from Covid-19 any more effectively than a placebo, according to a new study published in JAMA After reading so many "designed to fail" studies the past two years, I won't even bother to read this one. It's just going to be another late treatment or some other form of scam. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 79155232 02/19/2022 01:20 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: NEW: Ivermectin doesn’t prevent severe disease from Covid-19 any more effectively than a placebo, according to a new study published in JAMA Without zinc ivermectin is only as good as standard medical care... Hmm, that is something to think about. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 9858370 Ten years ago I would have believed what was a scientific study in JAMA But after a lot of revaluations about how “money “ controls the outcome of a lot of studies and papers published ! I have to be very careful when reading scientific research studies I tend to put more faith in some other countries published studies Than JAMA |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 82204230  Ukraine02/19/2022 01:21 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 77201647  France02/19/2022 01:21 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 46684751 United States02/19/2022 01:21 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 82204230 Ukraine02/19/2022 01:22 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 77201647 France02/19/2022 01:23 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: NEW: Ivermectin doesn’t prevent severe disease from Covid-19 any more effectively than a placebo, according to a new study published in JAMA What a convincing rebuttal of the findings from this large scale randomized clinical trial. I’ll be you did your own research. You must be trying to win the most annoying little bitch on earth prize. https://twitter.com/_/status/1492588394735677445 |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 81431535 United States02/19/2022 01:23 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Judethz
User ID: 79555498  United Kingdom02/19/2022 01:24 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 80285099  Czechia02/19/2022 01:25 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 34197783 United States02/19/2022 01:25 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: NEW: Ivermectin doesn’t prevent severe disease from Covid-19 any more effectively than a placebo, according to a new study published in JAMA The antiparasitic drug ivermectin doesn't prevent severe disease from COVID-19 any more effectively than symptom management and close observation by medical professionals, according to a study published Friday in the journal JAMA Internal Medicine. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 80683312 The study enrolled nearly 500 people 50 and older who were at risk of severe COVID-19 because of their age and underlying health. These patients were treated at 20 public hospitals and a quarantine center in Malaysia in 2021. Half of the patients took a relatively high dose of oral ivermectin for five days, and the other half — the comparison group — received treatment for their symptoms, such as fever-reducing medications. All were monitored for progression of the disease. There was no difference in outcomes between the groups. In fact, slightly more patients in the ivermectin group went on to need extra oxygen compared with those who took a placebo, though the difference was not statistically significant. This was the main outcome researchers studied, but they also looked at whether patients needed to be hospitalized, had to go on a ventilator, needed intensive care or died from their infections. There was no meaningful difference in outcomes between the group that took ivermectin and those who got the placebo treatment. [link to www.wesh.com (secure)] Complete and utter bullshit by lying douchebags. They WANT people to suffer while Ivermectin does work to cure Covid. |
| Judethz
User ID: 79555498 United Kingdom02/19/2022 01:25 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 23196659 United States02/19/2022 01:26 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: NEW: Ivermectin doesn’t prevent severe disease from Covid-19 any more effectively than a placebo, according to a new study published in JAMA So they quickly did a study on IV including the control group. When are they gonna do a study on the vax that includes controls? Yup, they dropped the vax control group like a hot potato and never completed the experiments. Anyone remember the size of the study group for PftIzer or Moderna? |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 79150106 United States02/19/2022 01:26 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: NEW: Ivermectin doesn’t prevent severe disease from Covid-19 any more effectively than a placebo, according to a new study published in JAMA why do these shills come and post their nonsense? to try to convince themselves or do they really think they can influence anyone at this point. After the past 2 years most are aware by now: -the cdc and the fda are corrupt agencies. they can go suck a dick. -covid is a joke. most likely why the pcr "test" was used. you can get whatever results you want depending on amount of cycles you run -most deaths were just your average deaths, well just call it covid now. -lets try to increase that amount further so can we get a side order of medical malpractice. -theres no reason for any emergency powers/acts. never was and definitely not now. The real danger is the "vaccines". Anyone promoting them is clueless. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 81656554  Portugal02/19/2022 01:27 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: NEW: Ivermectin doesn’t prevent severe disease from Covid-19 any more effectively than a placebo, according to a new study published in JAMA "Well, if you want to focus on differences between the two arms even if they are not statistically significant... The progress to severe disease occurred on average 3 days after inclusion. Yet, despite the ivermectin group having more people who progressed to severe disease, they had less mortality, less mechanical ventilation, less ICU admission, none of which was statistically significant, but the mortality difference was very close to statistical significance (0.09 when generally statistical significance is <0.05). You'd normally expect that the arm with greater early progression to severe disease would also have worse outcomes in the long run, which isn't the case here. Ivermectin arm Control arm P-score Total population 241 249 Progressed to severe disease 52 43 0.25 ICU admission 6 8 0.79 Mechanical ventilation 4 10 0.17 Death 3 10 0.09" Regardless of being statistically significant or not (they are very close to significance, actually), the fact is that people NOT treated with ivermectin died 3.33x more than people treated with ivermectin, and were placed in mechanical ventilation 2.5x more. It's easy to play tricks with statistical analysis when the sample size is small and the mortality is very low... Looking at the numbers with common sense, I am 100% sure Ivermectin works! |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 71454565 United States02/19/2022 01:27 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 77201647 France02/19/2022 01:28 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: NEW: Ivermectin doesn’t prevent severe disease from Covid-19 any more effectively than a placebo, according to a new study published in JAMA What a convincing rebuttal of the findings from this large scale randomized clinical trial. I’ll be you did your own research. Get fucked more than you already are, creep. No wait…you did your own research too? https://twitter.com/_/status/1434949099694944260 The claim is ivermection taken upon the onset of Covid 19 can cure Covid 19, not that it cured Covid 19 once the person was in the hospital, on a ventilator or well into the progression of Covid. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 79498302 United States02/19/2022 01:28 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: NEW: Ivermectin doesn’t prevent severe disease from Covid-19 any more effectively than a placebo, according to a new study published in JAMA Half of the patients took a relatively high dose of oral ivermectin for five days, and the other half — the comparison group — received treatment for their symptoms, such as fever-reducing medications. All were monitored for progression of the disease. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 80683312 That’s not a placebo holmes |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 82214519  Canada02/19/2022 01:29 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: NEW: Ivermectin doesn’t prevent severe disease from Covid-19 any more effectively than a placebo, according to a new study published in JAMA The Malaysian study proves that ivermectin fucking works, in spite of CNN fake news. [link to igorchudov.substack.com (secure)] |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 51031768 United States02/19/2022 01:29 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: NEW: Ivermectin doesn’t prevent severe disease from Covid-19 any more effectively than a placebo, according to a new study published in JAMA Fake news. These past 2 years there are way too many people getting cured using ivermectin. Not just on GLP with it's many threads on the subject, but world wide. My family amlnd i have been cured using ivermectin. Other countries around the world prescribe it to their citizens. Evil usa is the only odd ball depriving its population of life saving drugs. OP is a big pharma shill. Fake fucking article. Too many people around the world have taken ivermectin and have been cured and OP can never take that away except post fake bs news. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 79984963 United States02/19/2022 01:30 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
| DrumrDude
User ID: 51431492 United States02/19/2022 01:30 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: NEW: Ivermectin doesn’t prevent severe disease from Covid-19 any more effectively than a placebo, according to a new study published in JAMA What a convincing rebuttal of the findings from this large scale randomized clinical trial. I’ll be you did your own research. Get fucked more than you already are, creep. AGreed, how are the Mods allowing this crap? Clear pharma shill or complete left wing dolts. Ban both. |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 5905770 United States02/19/2022 01:30 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: NEW: Ivermectin doesn’t prevent severe disease from Covid-19 any more effectively than a placebo, according to a new study published in JAMA that's why they blew up some factories that had key ingredients in ivermectin cause they knew it was just placebo also ask the rancher down the road what he uses to clean his animals , of bots and parasites |
| Anonymous Coward User ID: 82214616 United States02/19/2022 01:31 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: NEW: Ivermectin doesn’t prevent severe disease from Covid-19 any more effectively than a placebo, according to a new study published in JAMA The antiparasitic drug ivermectin doesn't prevent severe disease from COVID-19 any more effectively than symptom management and close observation by medical professionals, according to a study published Friday in the journal JAMA Internal Medicine. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 80683312 The study enrolled nearly 500 people 50 and older who were at risk of severe COVID-19 because of their age and underlying health. These patients were treated at 20 public hospitals and a quarantine center in Malaysia in 2021. Half of the patients took a relatively high dose of oral ivermectin for five days, and the other half — the comparison group — received treatment for their symptoms, such as fever-reducing medications. All were monitored for progression of the disease. There was no difference in outcomes between the groups. In fact, slightly more patients in the ivermectin group went on to need extra oxygen compared with those who took a placebo, though the difference was not statistically significant. This was the main outcome researchers studied, but they also looked at whether patients needed to be hospitalized, had to go on a ventilator, needed intensive care or died from their infections. There was no meaningful difference in outcomes between the group that took ivermectin and those who got the placebo treatment. [link to www.wesh.com (secure)] Why the fuck would we trust the AMA? These people are responsible for literally murdering people with their fake treatments of covid -- remdesivir, ventilators, etc. They refuse monoclonal antibody treatment, ivermectin, hydroxychloroquine because they KNOW these are much more effective treatments than the crap they push or that non-vaccine they've been screaming about. The pharmaceutical companies are a big part in this. Watch a recent Project Veritas video straight from the horse's mouth. So fuck off with you bullshit doctor worship. |
| ~Breezy~
User ID: 81492100 United States02/19/2022 01:32 PM  Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Re: NEW: Ivermectin doesn’t prevent severe disease from Covid-19 any more effectively than a placebo, according to a new study published in JAMA It's establishment propaganda. Last Edited by (~.~) on 02/19/2022 01:33 PM Tried By Fire *my birthstone is a coffee bean*  |
| samanthasunflower
User ID: 81078243 United States02/19/2022 01:32 PM  Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Yeah that's what I was thinking. It goes counter to many other studies and is serving someones agenda.
