The Circular Repetitive Monotony of Philosophical Discourse

Yeah, man!

Sock it to me baby!

I'll consider anybody's crazy ideas, but they have to work when I try them.

Religion?

Faith is putting yourself in a place where God can use you, if you dare.

Leave it all to God, and keep on minding your own business.

Your own will.

god is teaching me to be
silent it requires
tremendous self control

Why do I keep getting this result?

But I'm not shutting up.

I'll test God's will to the limits.

It's the only place I can find it.

At the limits!

So, are you telling me to shut up?

Thread Epilogue:

The subject matter is unknowable and the terminology distasteful

It could have been an epilogue if you weren't so obviously obsessed with it. you're doing a great job keeping it alive

Shall I post whatever else I'd like, on any theme and make it undeniably meaningful and worth reading just because I feel like it?

Should I reveal what's so special about the primes? (IS there something special about them? Or Will they be discovered in the great work of exploring the idea>...?)

Of course, I can. I even might. I dont really know for sure, because, it was a moody thread to begin with.

It began with an intricately laced doily placed gingerly upon the glass whisker of an elegant catfrog. Then the moon said shh.....

After all, what's a dedicated hater but a servant?

I get it.

A dedicated hater is a servant to the person they hold anger for.

They are allowing the violator to rent space in their brain for free.

I'm using dedicated hater in the meaning of how someone who goes around hating on someone and instead spreads their fame or notoriety. They often end up increasing the fanbase of the one they were hating on. That's what I meant by servant.

I don't conflate anger and hate. They aren't the same.

I don't recommend processing things in a victimhood mentality. No it isn't to say there wasn't a violator in some case, just to say the villain and the victim are codependent for existence.

In this context here, not being general or philosophical about it, but only partially rhetorical, we have an exhibit.

The same poster makes posts that clearly intend to detract from the appearance of the thread. Perhaps is solely for the irony that the thread might rest, and the poster could move on in peace.

Or otherwise at a later time, it might pick up in quality.

In either case there isn't any meaningful benefit gained from taking weak jabs at a thread. At least, nothing I can imagine that isn't petty.

Hence, my servant who was attempting to summarize the thread exists here to fuel it along. What else of a purpose could be named for it?

I think I've made my meaning clear.

By the way. I'm being sarcastic about the servant part. I don't think people get it.