Godlike Productions - Discussion Forum
Users Online Now: 1,909 (Who's On?)Visitors Today: 741,187
Pageviews Today: 964,138Threads Today: 246Posts Today: 3,445
08:18 AM


Rate this Thread

Absolute BS Crap Reasonable Nice Amazing
 

>>5/19/2014 CONFIRMED! NASA EXPOSED HIDING GIANT UFO IN SOHO IMAGES

 
Mukk1234

User ID: 40837657
United States
05/19/2014 03:17 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: >>5/19/2014 CONFIRMED! NASA EXPOSED HIDING GIANT UFO IN SOHO IMAGES
3...2...1 Astro super shill....with his government issued
"Explanation"

"Sorry guys, this is an anomaly caused by the 3rd, 4th and 12th axis of the subatomic gyros modulator drifting approximately 000.0235 degrees from its regular position of 0.6987 quad vibrational orbit. Its simply a normal artifact that we...uh..I meant NASA regularly edits out due to bidirectional viewing of multiple professional astronomers like me. NASA is always a step ahead assuring we humans are never in a centrifuge of bioengineering viscosity that are always explained away with a simple and logical super intelligent explanation. NASA is hard at work every day looking out for "our" best interests, while at the same time assuring we remain 100% protected from interstellar projectiles of solidified mass.

Move along, nothing to see here.
 Quoting: Jango Mfwic


lol good one
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 18998741


LOL that is funny.....
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 56374054
United States
05/19/2014 03:20 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: >>5/19/2014 CONFIRMED! NASA EXPOSED HIDING GIANT UFO IN SOHO IMAGES
Come on now guys Astro is not a shill...never was..how many times has he come on here and helped everyone out when we were worried about something..the guys a genius! I think hes great..please stop dissing him he only tries to get to the bottom of things by doing the research and proving his observations.
RTS REDUX

User ID: 57849075
United States
05/19/2014 03:21 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: >>5/19/2014 CONFIRMED! NASA EXPOSED HIDING GIANT UFO IN SOHO IMAGES
Over the years I have encountered the notion of our sun being a "gateway" numerous times - and interestingly across several scientific disciplines.

We hear it form those arguing the concept of an electric universe, we hear it from leading quantum physicists and several modern day astronomers says so too, not to mention a large body of intelligent, autonomous people here on GLP and other forums.

Just go through the many threads on the subject - and you will find plenty of scientific sources with the best credentials.

We also find it in the Mayan artifacts, in ancient Egypt and the Nordic Solar worship, not to mention the Sumerian- and early meso-american cultures and among the Dogon people in Africa and the Aboriginals in Australia.

It is described in science fiction and other literature, and is all over age-old esoterism and modern day mythology.

It can be defended and explained using contemporary science, math and (quantum) physics.

Finally, there has been so many clear and crisp sightings and documentations during the years that almost is ridiculous.

…..and yet we still discuss every single encounter as if it is the only one that matters.

This makes us focus on a pixel - not the overall picture.

You only have to take one step up the ladder to leave the rabbit hole - and to see that the equation you thought you knew so well - only was half the equation, and that reality is much richer that most people (still) are willing to believe.
 Quoting: Comperio


yes indeed..well said! applause

3-12inv211
Éireann

User ID: 58168905
United States
05/19/2014 03:21 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: >>5/19/2014 CONFIRMED! NASA EXPOSED HIDING GIANT UFO IN SOHO IMAGES
Here is the original image, uncensored:


:putincme:
 Quoting: FreakObserver

He really gets around!
Eireann~

I am crucified with Christ: nevertheless I live; yet not I, but Christ liveth in me: and the life which I now live in the flesh I live by the faith of the Son of God, who loved me, and gave himself for me. - Galatians 2:20
Earth420

User ID: 57688933
United States
05/19/2014 03:23 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: >>5/19/2014 CONFIRMED! NASA EXPOSED HIDING GIANT UFO IN SOHO IMAGES
hiding
Love to Mother Earth Always
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 56374054
United States
05/19/2014 03:24 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: >>5/19/2014 CONFIRMED! NASA EXPOSED HIDING GIANT UFO IN SOHO IMAGES
In the grand masterpiece of the universe we are nothing..yet everything.
ThesonofhendriX

User ID: 47844632
Germany
05/19/2014 03:27 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: >>5/19/2014 CONFIRMED! NASA EXPOSED HIDING GIANT UFO IN SOHO IMAGES
NASA Never A Straight Answer.
Life is a dream and we are the imagination of ourselves.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 58248612
Portugal
05/19/2014 03:28 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: >>5/19/2014 CONFIRMED! NASA EXPOSED HIDING GIANT UFO IN SOHO IMAGES
It's the "7 sisters" star cluster. One click in photoshops bandaid tool would edit that out seamlessly. This is a "glitch"
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 56165770

The stars that make up the Pleiades have never looked all spaced out and ordered like that since I've been looking at them and that's going on 48 years tomorrow.

I've seen the Pleiades on SOHO images before, and that isn't close. It might not be an alien spaceship, but I don't think it's the Pleiades either.
 Quoting: Éireann


hesright
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 58248470
United States
05/19/2014 03:29 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: >>5/19/2014 CONFIRMED! NASA EXPOSED HIDING GIANT UFO IN SOHO IMAGES
I knew a guy, through one of my sons, that used to work for Nasa helped design ships and things...he went crazy and got fired.

He is very intelligent though drinks allot now..and still is not all there sometimes...but he said that there are things that are being kept hush hush and nobody is allowed to talk about them...but when he drinks he talks...and he has said that there is definitely ships out there that are of unknown origin and they are manned...they are watching us..why ? He said nobody knows..just speculation that it is because we are not advanced enough yet to be able to understand it all and our primitive emotions are also a factor.
He also said that there were many different types of ships and occupants so his best guess is that they must have some kind of higher command which only allows exploratory operations and it must be taboo to actually communicate with us. Some galactic federation rule of some kind.

Whatever they motivations are our government is well aware of it and are constantly monitoring the situation...the true facts will never be put out to the public unless they think there will be an attack and even that would be a too late ..so sorry gesture..he says.

He said our place in this galaxy is known and spreading it is just a matter of time before some warlike entities invade our quadrant of space and try to lay claim ...there may even be a battle between species up there he said. But the unknowns still outweigh the knowns at the present time.

All he really said after that was that we are vulnerable like babes in a basket.
 Quoting: PolarPrecursor


lmao
Esoteric Morgan
...in awe of many things

User ID: 26943919
United States
05/19/2014 03:29 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: >>5/19/2014 CONFIRMED! NASA EXPOSED HIDING GIANT UFO IN SOHO IMAGES
I must say; I usually laugh at these("SECURE TEAM") guys but:

"That's interesting"...waitwhat


Having seenit many times I don'think its the Plieades cluster.

A third grader could do a better photoshop job covering "the anomalie".Whatever it is. I'm not jumping to "ship"until it lands on my front lawn and Klaatu steps out...
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 28285524



I've gotten to the point where I'm starting to believe they don't care if we know they're covering things up. All that matters is that they cover it up.

It's like in your face undisclosed disclosure...which I find to be very oxymoronic.

It keeps our hopes up for the day when someone further up the chain decides it's something that can finally be revealed officially. Then, at that point, they can say: "Look, we DID leave you signs. It's not like we scrubbed everything."
-- TRUST THE PLAN --
.......WWG1WGA......
____________________________
still in awe of many things
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 57880209
France
05/19/2014 03:30 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: >>5/19/2014 CONFIRMED! NASA EXPOSED HIDING GIANT UFO IN SOHO IMAGES
The FTS won't download either ... lol

Don't believe me, check for yourself:

[link to i58.tinypic.com]
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 58241521


Another FACT:

I installed JHelioviewer on my computer, but by some mysterious reason it's NOT retrieving ANY images of LASCO C2, on May 12 and back. Neither from May 12 to the present date.

[link to i.share.pho.to]

[link to i.share.pho.to]

[link to i.share.pho.to]

But by some other mysterious reason, it returns all images of LASCO C2 from May 13 to the present date.

[link to i.share.pho.to]

billclinton1
ThesonofhendriX

User ID: 47844632
Germany
05/19/2014 03:33 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: >>5/19/2014 CONFIRMED! NASA EXPOSED HIDING GIANT UFO IN SOHO IMAGES
Somebodies going to loose their job over this..

Probably the photoshop guy.
Life is a dream and we are the imagination of ourselves.
Dr. AstroModerator
Senior Forum Moderator

User ID: 4211721
United States
05/19/2014 03:35 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: >>5/19/2014 CONFIRMED! NASA EXPOSED HIDING GIANT UFO IN SOHO IMAGES
3...2...1 Astro super shill....with his government issued
"Explanation"

"Sorry guys, this is an anomaly caused by the 3rd, 4th and 12th axis of the subatomic gyros modulator drifting approximately 000.0235 degrees from its regular position of 0.6987 quad vibrational orbit. Its simply a normal artifact that we...uh..I meant NASA regularly edits out due to bidirectional viewing of multiple professional astronomers like me. NASA is always a step ahead assuring we humans are never in a centrifuge of bioengineering viscosity that are always explained away with a simple and logical super intelligent explanation. NASA is hard at work every day looking out for "our" best interests, while at the same time assuring we remain 100% protected from interstellar projectiles of solidified mass.

Move along, nothing to see here.
 Quoting: Jango Mfwic


lol good one
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 18998741


LOL that is funny.....
 Quoting: Mukk1234


I'm STILL waiting for Jango to answer me on his "moon top missing" thread.
astrobanner2
ThesonofhendriX

User ID: 47844632
Germany
05/19/2014 03:35 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: >>5/19/2014 CONFIRMED! NASA EXPOSED HIDING GIANT UFO IN SOHO IMAGES
Its not the pleiades star system... I have seen the pleiades through a telescope and naked eye many times, and star clusters don't suddenly decide to change shape.
Life is a dream and we are the imagination of ourselves.
Dr. AstroModerator
Senior Forum Moderator

User ID: 4211721
United States
05/19/2014 03:37 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: >>5/19/2014 CONFIRMED! NASA EXPOSED HIDING GIANT UFO IN SOHO IMAGES
Its not the pleiades star system... I have seen the pleiades through a telescope and naked eye many times, and star clusters don't suddenly decide to change shape.
 Quoting: ThesonofhendriX


It's not in the raw data either... But hey, you want to take the word of a youtuber because he made a video go ahead. I have the raw fits data. Does he? And yes, I downloaded it before the server went down, which is why I am able to upload the file myself:
[link to dropcanvas.com]
astrobanner2
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 57880209
France
05/19/2014 03:38 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: >>5/19/2014 CONFIRMED! NASA EXPOSED HIDING GIANT UFO IN SOHO IMAGES
My final conclusion before I leave this useless thread is:

# The dude in OP's video didn't provide any original source of the alleged non-tampered frame.

# Astro didn't provide any proof that the original frame is not tampered either, because a) his alleged processed image doesn't have a time stamp and b) the server [link to sharpp.nrl.navy.mil] is blocking the download of the images.

# Therefore there's no proof that there WAS tampering, neither that there WAS NOT tampering.

putin
Dr. AstroModerator
Senior Forum Moderator

User ID: 4211721
United States
05/19/2014 03:41 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: >>5/19/2014 CONFIRMED! NASA EXPOSED HIDING GIANT UFO IN SOHO IMAGES
My final conclusion before I leave this useless thread is:

# The dude in OP's video didn't provide any original source of the alleged non-tampered frame.

# Astro didn't provide any proof that the original frame is not tampered either, because a) his alleged processed image doesn't have a time stamp and b) the server [link to sharpp.nrl.navy.mil] is blocking the download of the images.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 57880209

The raw images do not have timestamps burned into the images, that's why they're raw. The fits file DOES have the timestamp in the fits header info though. Here's the fits header data:
Format: 1024x1024
(0,0)-(0,0) - Binning: 2x2
- - IT: 0.00
DATE (of writting): 2014//2005
DATE (of observation): 2014//2005
TIME (of observation): 14:12:05.417

=== FITS header ===
SIMPLE = T / Written by IDL: Tue May 13 08:17:42 2014
BITPIX = 16 /
NAXIS = 2 /
NAXIS1 = 1024 /
NAXIS2 = 1024 /
FILENAME= '21479336.fts' /
FILEORIG= '140512_141404.img' /
DATE = '2014/05/13 12:17:42.198' /
DATE-OBS= '2014/05/12' /
TIME-OBS= '14:12:05.417' /
P1COL = 20 /
P1ROW = 1 /
P2COL = 1043 /
P2ROW = 1024 /
VERSION = 2 /
EXPTIME = 25.0967 /
EXP0 = 23.0000 /
EXPCMD = 23.0000 /
EXP1 = 1.88379 /
EXP2 = 2.04297 /
EXP3 = 2.09668 /
TELESCOP= 'SOHO ' /
INSTRUME= 'LASCO ' /
DETECTOR= 'C2 ' /
READPORT= 'C ' /
SUMROW = 0 /
SUMCOL = 0 /
LEBXSUM = 1 /
LEBYSUM = 1 /
SHUTTR = 0 /
LAMP = 0 /
FILTER = 'Orange ' /
POLAR = 'Clear ' /
LP_NUM = 'Normal ' /
OS_NUM = 4136 /
IMGCTR = 1378 /
IMGSEQ = 0 /
COMPRSSN= 'XZ% ' /
HCOMP_SF= 64 /
MID_DATE= 56789 /
MID_TIME= 51138.0 /
PLATESCL= 11.9000 /
OFFSET = 629.680 /
IMAGE_CT= 1378 /
SEQ_NUM = 0 /
OBT_TIME= 1778595160.42 /
R1COL = 20 /
R1ROW = 1 /
R2COL = 1043 /
R2ROW = 1024 /
From the raw fits file:
[link to dropcanvas.com]
headshot

Last Edited by Astromut on 05/19/2014 03:42 PM
astrobanner2
ThesonofhendriX

User ID: 47844632
Germany
05/19/2014 03:43 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: >>5/19/2014 CONFIRMED! NASA EXPOSED HIDING GIANT UFO IN SOHO IMAGES
If its any consolation, maybe there are no aliens, and we have the entire solar system to ourselves, asteroids, Oort cloud, moons, the lot. Should come in useful in the future.

Of course no sane person believes that to be the case.
Life is a dream and we are the imagination of ourselves.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 58241521
United States
05/19/2014 03:45 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: >>5/19/2014 CONFIRMED! NASA EXPOSED HIDING GIANT UFO IN SOHO IMAGES
The FTS won't download either ... lol

Don't believe me, check for yourself:

[link to i58.tinypic.com]
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 58241521


Another FACT:

I installed JHelioviewer on my computer, but by some mysterious reason it's NOT retrieving ANY images of LASCO C2, on May 12 and back. Neither from May 12 to the present date.

[link to i.share.pho.to]

[link to i.share.pho.to]

[link to i.share.pho.to]

But by some other mysterious reason, it returns all images of LASCO C2 from May 13 to the present date.

[link to i.share.pho.to]

billclinton1
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 57880209


BOMBSHELL BABY ...

(Vachement bien fait, Frenchie :-) J'étais plutôt fatigué de réintroduire les chiffres ... Merci pour ta contribution inestimable)
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 58233157
Germany
05/19/2014 04:07 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: >>5/19/2014 CONFIRMED! NASA EXPOSED HIDING GIANT UFO IN SOHO IMAGES


Pope is ready!

Pope Francis spent some time during Mass at the Vatican on Monday talking about alien life forms, and suggested that Martians, should they ever visit Earth, would be welcome to be baptized as well.


[link to www.news.va]

alien11
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 58224992
United States
05/19/2014 04:07 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: >>5/19/2014 CONFIRMED! NASA EXPOSED HIDING GIANT UFO IN SOHO IMAGES
It is a literal physical impossibility for that "spaceship" to be made of any sort of matter.

It doesn't "matter" if you believe aliens are millions of years more advanced than humans or not, it is physically NOT POSSIBLE for that image to be created of anything solid.

Could it be light or plasma? Sure, but then it would not be extraterrestrial, it would be inter dimensional, or spiritual.
SunnyDaze

User ID: 26484773
United States
05/19/2014 04:13 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: >>5/19/2014 CONFIRMED! NASA EXPOSED HIDING GIANT UFO IN SOHO IMAGES
Understood, but my question is, if it was a glitch why did NASA go in and pixel block it? Why not just leave it alone? Why take the time to go into the data and put up a obvious block on the image?
 Quoting: Mukk1234


exactly ...why edit something "normal"

personally, it doesn't look like a "ship" to me at all... and it isn't the Pleadies either ... which begs the question ... WHAT is it ... why wouldn't NASA just tell them instead of "no comment" - why not tell the TRUTH (for once)?

and we all know what an ass-kisser Ashole mut is, so I wouldn't believe a word he says - about ANY subject ... especially after NASA refuses to comment ... but lets their internet knob polisher answer for them ... pathetic ... but undoubtedly earning him brownie points ... who knows, maybe all his brown-nosing will pay off, and NASA might offer him a job as a "fixer".... on second thought - not likely since they know how brain-washed he already is - how completely programed to take it upon himself to make up lame excuses for their ignorance ... everyone who has an interest in Astrology KNOW NASA falsifies data.
who would want to work with a self-deluded guy like that?
Dr. AstroModerator
Senior Forum Moderator

User ID: 4211721
United States
05/19/2014 04:14 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: >>5/19/2014 CONFIRMED! NASA EXPOSED HIDING GIANT UFO IN SOHO IMAGES
Understood, but my question is, if it was a glitch why did NASA go in and pixel block it? Why not just leave it alone? Why take the time to go into the data and put up a obvious block on the image?
 Quoting: Mukk1234


exactly ...why edit something "normal"
 Quoting: SunnyDaze

It's not edited, it's a glitch, which is why that "block" isn't in the raw data, nor is the "ship" claimed by the youtuber. The only evidence that there was ever a "ship" in the image is the youtuber himself, but the raw data contradicts this.
astrobanner2
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 58197101
United Kingdom
05/19/2014 04:21 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: >>5/19/2014 CONFIRMED! NASA EXPOSED HIDING GIANT UFO IN SOHO IMAGES
It's the "7 sisters" star cluster. One click in photoshops bandaid tool would edit that out seamlessly. This is a "glitch"
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 56165770

The stars that make up the Pleiades have never looked all spaced out and ordered like that since I've been looking at them and that's going on 48 years tomorrow.

I've seen the Pleiades on SOHO images before, and that isn't close. It might not be an alien spaceship, but I don't think it's the Pleiades either.
 Quoting: Éireann


eireann you just replied to the schill lol
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 22146748
United States
05/19/2014 04:26 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: >>5/19/2014 CONFIRMED! NASA EXPOSED HIDING GIANT UFO IN SOHO IMAGES
9 pages, to hell with it.

Oh well, why not.


I watch LASCO daily; been looking up for as long as I can remember.

It's asymmetrical. Count the lights.

The pixel shows an extra light dot to the left of it. I should add that these pixels appear DAILY.

Where are the before and after frames to show it's movement? If the interval skips 30 minutes or more then yes, they altered things. You can watch the timestamp, it serves as an obvious clue to obfuscation.

Don't forget, there's TONS of space junk orbiting us.

I will say that it looks suspiciously 'man-made', but let's talk scaling. This would be almost the size of Earth if it were indeed a craft. Yes, slight exaggeration, but what is 6/9 the size of Earth to use in comparison here?

Finally, NASA is the LAST place we'll get what we want.


They'll let us know when they're here.

And they SURE AS HELL won't hang their ass out in front of the only lightbulb in the house if they want to stay hidden. NASA or no NASA.


Just a few thoughts-I don't have a final conclusion regarding authenticity.

Besides. By page 9 everything's turned to shit anyway.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 22146748
United States
05/19/2014 04:28 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: >>5/19/2014 CONFIRMED! NASA EXPOSED HIDING GIANT UFO IN SOHO IMAGES
Understood, but my question is, if it was a glitch why did NASA go in and pixel block it? Why not just leave it alone? Why take the time to go into the data and put up a obvious block on the image?
 Quoting: Mukk1234


exactly ...why edit something "normal"
 Quoting: SunnyDaze

It's not edited, it's a glitch, which is why that "block" isn't in the raw data, nor is the "ship" claimed by the youtuber. The only evidence that there was ever a "ship" in the image is the youtuber himself, but the raw data contradicts this.
 Quoting: Dr. Astro


I'm one of the few here who respect you, and I'll say that I agree with you.

If they were 'hiding it' with a pixel, the pixel would SOMEWHAT match the color behind it. At least a LITTLE.

This would be the equivalent of having your mistress sneak out past your wife with a fake mustache on.

I love metaphor.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 58197101
United Kingdom
05/19/2014 04:30 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: >>5/19/2014 CONFIRMED! NASA EXPOSED HIDING GIANT UFO IN SOHO IMAGES
9 pages, to hell with it.

Oh well, why not.


I watch LASCO daily; been looking up for as long as I can remember.

It's asymmetrical. Count the lights.

The pixel shows an extra light dot to the left of it. I should add that these pixels appear DAILY.

Where are the before and after frames to show it's movement? If the interval skips 30 minutes or more then yes, they altered things. You can watch the timestamp, it serves as an obvious clue to obfuscation.

Don't forget, there's TONS of space junk orbiting us.

I will say that it looks suspiciously 'man-made', but let's talk scaling. This would be almost the size of Earth if it were indeed a craft. Yes, slight exaggeration, but what is 6/9 the size of Earth to use in comparison here?

Finally, NASA is the LAST place we'll get what we want.


They'll let us know when they're here.

And they SURE AS HELL won't hang their ass out in front of the only lightbulb in the house if they want to stay hidden. NASA or no NASA.


Just a few thoughts-I don't have a final conclusion regarding authenticity.

Besides. By page 9 everything's turned to shit anyway.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 22146748


clappa
Dr. AstroModerator
Senior Forum Moderator

User ID: 4211721
United States
05/19/2014 04:31 PM

Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: >>5/19/2014 CONFIRMED! NASA EXPOSED HIDING GIANT UFO IN SOHO IMAGES
Understood, but my question is, if it was a glitch why did NASA go in and pixel block it? Why not just leave it alone? Why take the time to go into the data and put up a obvious block on the image?
 Quoting: Mukk1234


exactly ...why edit something "normal"
 Quoting: SunnyDaze

It's not edited, it's a glitch, which is why that "block" isn't in the raw data, nor is the "ship" claimed by the youtuber. The only evidence that there was ever a "ship" in the image is the youtuber himself, but the raw data contradicts this.
 Quoting: Dr. Astro


I'm one of the few here who respect you, and I'll say that I agree with you.

If they were 'hiding it' with a pixel, the pixel would SOMEWHAT match the color behind it. At least a LITTLE.

This would be the equivalent of having your mistress sneak out past your wife with a fake mustache on.

I love metaphor.
 Quoting: Anonymous Coward 22146748


Well if they were blocking something, it should be blocked first and foremost in the raw data as well. Truth is, data dropouts do happen and bits of images get lost, but that isn't even the case here. It's not even that. It's purely a glitch in between the raw image data and the processed JPG available online. Naturally the damn database for raw images goes down right after I say that, making me look like a damn shill since I'm the only one left standing with the raw data from before the database went down.
astrobanner2
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 22146748
United States
05/19/2014 04:32 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: >>5/19/2014 CONFIRMED! NASA EXPOSED HIDING GIANT UFO IN SOHO IMAGES
Come on now guys Astro is not a shill...never was..how many times has he come on here and helped everyone out when we were worried about something..the guys a genius! I think hes great..please stop dissing him he only tries to get to the bottom of things by doing the research and proving his observations.
 Quoting: PolarPrecursor


Slow down sugar, genius is a pretty heavy term to toss at an online persona.

But yes, I've been on his side since Elenin.

Simply put, people don't want what he has. They want national enquirer BS to gawk at.

He simply introduces common sense, mixed with a decent scientific view, which no one here wants to hear (well, some do.). They come for the nibirubooboo and reptile popes.

But, I for one, would be remiss should he ever stop speaking common sense when these apes start selling their children's college funds for bug out bags.
Anonymous Coward
User ID: 58197101
United Kingdom
05/19/2014 04:32 PM
Report Abusive Post
Report Copyright Violation
Re: >>5/19/2014 CONFIRMED! NASA EXPOSED HIDING GIANT UFO IN SOHO IMAGES
btw dr. astro... nasa want the raw image you have back.





GLP