Really good documentary on the number 1 deception

I don't like the style..

I love seeing globies practically get a heart attack from anger at the thought of flat earth.

Enjoy.

That video proves they used a fisheye lense. You can see it warp.

Flat earth?

SMH


Face palm

Any pilot can tell you otherwise.

We're just sad for you believing a demonstrable lie. And by extension it makes GLP look bad. It's one thing to be open-minded, but totally another thing believe in something which cannot possibly be true.

Flat earth?

SMH


Face palm

Any pilot can tell you otherwise.

They tell you idiots the truth in movies. "Fiction" that is in actuality closer to the truth than people realize, but the 'movie' solidifies the idea that it is only fiction in your minds.. a plausible deniability aspect for those that can't handle being lied to that big. kind of like a slap in the face insult to how stupid you are believing the LIE they've sold you for decades. but you persist. and one day, it's going to dawn on you. and yeah.. you will feel pretty dumb for not even considering that you were being lied to. at least partially.. that you were not being given the full picture... only part of it... and the rest they dropped hints in plain sight but you still didn't see it.

until YOU get to go into space, you are merely taking other's words and presentations for what the truth is. it's not like the powerful haven't lied to you before in a big way right? lol after all, who would stand to gain? think about that one.

I predict many a face palm occurring when that day comes.



comforting lies? or uncomfortable truth? which do you prefer.

Sure! [link to mydarksky.org (secure)]

And actually, I was wrong: it's about 26,000 years.

Whether the ball Earth model is accurate or not is irrelevant to the accuracy of the FE model. It must stand or not on its own merits. The most basic of which would be an accurate MAP od the Flat Earth. Where are the edges? Do you subscribe to the Antarctica-all-around map, or a different one?

You won't accept any pictures taken from space, so that's moot.

An accurate Ball-Earth map is (surprise) a physical globe. All other maps are distorted in one way or another. The LEAST distorted flat map is the Auth-Graph projection here: [link to geoawesomeness.com (secure)]

And on it, the North Pole is still a mess.

Here's how Constellations move on a "Ball Earth:"

[link to www.windows2universe.org (secure)]

Here's a bit about Stars fix-ed-ness. [link to www.wtamu.edu (secure)]

(And, by the by, the Solar System only moves about 3 billion miles a year. Takes some time to get to trillions.)

As to why there would be two different points the heavens would seem to rotate about, it's because you're looking from the "top" and "bottom" of a 3-dimensional object rotating. There *has* to be 2 points of rotation and voila! There are.

So, now that I have addressed your questions, could you see yourself linking to similar pages supporting your positions? And I prefer reading over youtube, if at all possible.

Very intriguing. Both sides make compelling arguments. As with everything, hard to know what to believe anymore.

The most interesting part about it, it could actually be true. How a lie could become so hardwired into our collective psyches... Glittering generalities and cool kid "c'mon man" narratives.