Evolution was the first "Trust the Science" scam.

Yep.
Evolutionists won't discuss where the first life form came from or how it got 'life' - they only state that it existed and then evolved from one form to the next.

You just have to believe and trust it.
Have faith.

It's a religion.

I remember sitting in uni class long time ago.

Developmental biology course.

And thinking what a load of bullocks..

Lol..

Science falsely so called..

The recapitulation theory..

Ontology recapitulates phylogeny..

And I thought “I am paying for this tripe?”

i have read the origin of species and it's not really controversial. origin of species, not the origin of life.

better than the 'trust the religion' scam.


trust logic. trust good things, pleasant experiences, suffering bad. pleasure good.

I've read it as well.
Did you know Darwin was paid to come up with a theory to explain the existence of life without GOD, and so he came up with evolution.

When you have an end agenda before you even start - that goes against all scientific protocol. But hey, mutations are never beneficial for any animal, and yet evolution demands such EVERY SINGLE TIME.

Yeah, it's bullshit.

evolution is a religion.

Flat Earthers UNITE!

Actually it was the Copernican Revolution.

Before that, You were more than an individual that was created by God. You were an individual created by God placed on Planet Earth, which was the CENTER OF THE UNIVERSE.

Yes...you were so important the entire Universe revolved around you.

Then Copernicus moved you to a small planet, revolving around a medium sized sun, which was one of billions of suns.

That philosophical change in the status of man directly started the scientific revolution that led to and allowed Evolution.

Wow.
What a stupid analogy.
It totally ignores the fact that evolution is not scientific at all. There is absolutely zero scientific basis that a chicken evolved from a dinosaur.
If it really is "survival of the fittest" - why a chicken over a dinosaur?

Never mind the internal soft organ variances from animal to animal - evolutionists refuse to discuss this because they can't.

Nah, blood letting and leaches.
Trust the science, and remember to close your windows at night to keep the dark air out.
Trust the science.

Covid vaxxines are the new superstition.
Take three or more shots that may kill or impair you and not only will you not have immunity to covid, you may die from covid, you will still spread covid, and you will seem to catch covid again and again when unvaxxed do not catch it more than once. As well for fun you will be at risk from sads and sudden aggressive cancers.

But don't worry because with each clot shot you have personally enriched the Trudeau foundation who purely by coincidence was in the position to mandate that you make them money.

Evolution has absolutely nothing to do with religion..

Why didn't God allow species to evolve on Earth? If you look at evolutions, it's almost impossible to see how God didn't have a hand in it.

Agreed, evolution is a load of bullshit.
But, so is Christianity

Incorrect.
Evolution is a faith-based belief system - which by definition IS a religion.
They have preachers (so-called Scientists) and indoctrination 'churches' (universities and colleges) that spread the religion of evolution with zero facts.
Evolution is the worst kind of religion because it equates human existence with ZERO meaning of life. Your life is an accident and your existence means NOTHING.
No wonder suicide is at all-time highs.
They teach kids that their life is meaningless.

Psychiatry predates ‘em all.

You could have literally picked any other religion...yet you guys attack the one that hasn't been proven false. Unlike the others.

Evolution vs Intelligent Design is yet another divisive distraction promoted by human predators.

God did not create the earth in a single day, nor are his days as short as ours.

Something like 90% of dog breeds didn't exist only 100 years ago. Yet look at how specialized they all are now. Yet here you are unable to recognize that selection pressure can drive meaningful physiological and anatomical adaptations.

This is almost as dumb as the flat earth thread.

He's right you know.
Dog breeds are selective breeding not evolution of new species.

It's a strong indicator that if taken further that eventually they will split into separate species.

Science asks questions and attempts to find the best verifiable answer.

So, in in many millions of years we will be able to look back at this question and answer within a reasonable degree.

Earth is 6000 years old, too.

The theory of evolution by natural selection attempts to explain these phenomenon we find in phylogentetics and archaeology in a way that catalogs life as it changed over millions of years.

1. It does not posit anything about the origin of life
2. It does not strictly refute creationism.

Conscious humans using adaptations to fine tune a species of dog bares no relation to nature accidentally producing 10 million species of beings with highly refined senses and phsyiological abilities. Unless of course nature is conscious.

The current neo-darwinist evolution theory is not tenable due to these factors:

• Acquired physical traits are NOT passed down, only genes are passed down, to subsequent generations. Disproving Darwins notion that acquired traits accumulated over subsequent generations and generated different living species. There were no inheritable variations for natural selection to choose from. They re-wrote the theory to include Mutation.
• Mutation. Mutations do not add genetic information for species to ‘mutate’ into different kinds of species.
• The fossil record shows all forms of life, many of which currently exist, coming into existence almost simultaneously in the Cambrian Explosion, this is contrary evidence to a slow mutating naturally selective tree of transforming species.
• Abiogenesis has not been seen to possible for 170 years and counting.
• Minimal Gene Set concept. Evolutionists needed a beginning from 0 gene but you cannot get down to below 397 gene sets to create a functional cell. That is the minimal gene set for a living cell.
• Dembski’s 1995 Complex Specified Information theorem (CSi) shows that it is impossible for the complex genome of biological cells to have been formed by horizontal causation and a vertical cauaslity Or intelligent design Or a structure to follow, would have to be integrated into the calculation for it ever to be realised in physical nature.
• Plants and insects have symbiotic interdependent relationship for survival. In some cases this would not be able to form overtime but quite rapidly in order for the both life forms to have survived.

The OP is correct but I would suggest the false heliocentrism and associated pseudo-astrophysics led the way to the modern delusional materialistic mammon mindset of egotistical madness and scientific corruption.

No. A good portion of Darwin’s original hypothesis has been rejected….by science. However his basic claim of diversity of life via adaptation and genetic changes has been repeatedly been demonstrated. Now tell me when blantenly false claims in the Bible have been deleted? You can’t. That’s the difference between science and religion. Science is not trying to prove anything except to understand the natural universe around us and why things happen. If that conflicts with your magic man claims…that’s your problem. Oddly you enjoy science. You are on the internet, science. Powered by electricity via a power grid that generated it via complex multiple sciences. Drive a car or ride in a plane? Multiple hard science did that. Get sick? Go to a doctor? Darn science again. Check the weather for a up coming trip? Let’s see…science via satellites taking photos and tracking changing conditions! Darn science again. Evolution is the current accepted theory on the diversity of life. Oddly, if tomorrow it was found to be totally wrong…that doesn’t prove anything about a god. Further, science will discover if evolution is wrong not god claims.

you are smarter than the average bear

Evolution demands that the second law of thermodynamics be ignored. It also demands that mutations be beneficial, which science has proven is not the case. Real science proves evolution is false.