Question for the anti-bank, anti-lending and anti-crypto crowd (who believe all 3)

The cartoons created by Paul Grignon of British Columbia meet your LOW level of comprehension.

Link provided several posts back.

Dumbass, houses are only actually worth about 50 k.

You are paying for tge location and amenities of the area.

Stop falling for that and you don’t need banks, etc.

The easy credit; tight credit cycle by which the bankers scoop up ownership of everything was recognized by President Jackson.

Jackson commissioned William Gouge who wrote “A Short History of Paper Money and Banking in the United States (Philadelphia: T.W. Ustick, 1833; reprinted August M Kelley, 1968) 34”

This book can be found in the library here:

[link to www.complementarycurrency.org]

President Jackson later stopped the bankers. I personally digitized that report from a hardcover book in my possession.

[link to www.complementarycurrency.org]

The point is that the present system is not working for the people. Belief that somehow the present system is “perfect” and you just need to learn how to use it is in my opinion as backward as using flat-earth maps from the year 1300 to navigate the globe.

Auriti; Induction of Value to Money and the Ownership Thereafter: [link to www.gdrc.org]

Catching the attention of the bureaucrats

Stop paying them.

Two thefts took place in the 1930s; everyone knows the first – the roundup of gold. Very few comprehend the second sequential theft.

You see, once redemption of paper money by specie (precious metals) stops, by default the paper money becomes a unit of credit backed by the common credit of the people.

Uncle Sam stole your credit [card] in an act of identity theft. This identity theft was the implementation of the fifth plank of the communist manifesto. The common credit of the people is claimed to be the property of the government. The government in turn assigned the common credit of the people to the banks who now loan the people's credit back to the people at interest.

The banks, and the elites who own and control the banks are profiting by trafficking in stolen property. We the people are due a very large claw-back of property of all descriptions.

Most people, reading this brief introduction, will conclude [incorrectly] that redemption of paper money by specie coinage must be resumed. My argument is quite different. My argument is that paper money and electronic money are quite adequate. The common credit of the people using various promises to create and deliver value in the future is a good and valid type of money system. It is my argument that money is actually a communication and the monetary communications of the people between each other may be carried by a plethora of devices already in common usage. What needs then in my opinion are formalized answers to two problems.

Problem one addresses the question; “How do I ascertain whether this monetary communication is true?” and the second question is really an extension of the first; “How am I guaranteed specific performance of contract?”

What I propose is not a patchwork repair job on the existing system; what I propose is a radical redesign that returns ownership of the common credit to the people and the ownership and benefits of banking to the people as a whole. Answers to the two problems identified must be created and formalized in law.

We can look to the Basque Cooperative (Spain) for a model of ownership in common with benefits to the people.

When you can’t put ideas into your own words, they aren’t your ideas. You’re some random guy on the internet. I’m not going to invest my time in random links posted by someone who likely doesn’t even understand what he is posting.

If you can’t summarize in your own words what your thesis is in a succinct manner, you don’t fully grasp the ideas.

your banques pay no appreciable interest on deposits

that is the foundation of functional capitalism

deposits>lending capital

now apply your gibberish to israel

Do you know what a cost manual is? Do you realize you can price a house out like that?

If your house costs $50,000, it’s not much of a house.

And of course you are paying for location. Do you think that is some inside secret or something? Lol

And furthermore, what does that have to do with lending and banking???

Lol what a moran

Paul Grignon of British Columbia Canada provides cartoon explanations for the benefit of the literacy challenged:

Talk about gibberish

You still can’t put it succinctly in your own words because you don’t actually understand what you’re posting.

The Phelps County bank of Rollo Missouri is owned by the employees. An ESOP inspired system: [link to www.mypcb.com (secure)]

Would you enjoy an ownership position in a commercial bank with profits returning as a secondary income fashion?

You’re masturbatory spam of the thread is appearing to be an attempt to derail it.

You still haven’t put any ideas into your own words or clearly expressed your point of view in a summarized form.

If you can’t do that, you don’t grasp what you’re saying.

Fixed typo

If people were homeless they would get off their asses and take their country back.

People are going to need a dose of reality soon or it's all lost.

The Binary Capital principle ( [link to binarycapital.co.uk (secure)] )

is best illustrated at the Basque Cooperative in Spain where the Cooperative has paved the roads, built a hospital and a university while not incurring long term debt.

Ask this of yourself: "Who owns my credit?" and then go on to ask by what process was my credit stolen.

What?

So your idea is that people should go homeless so then they “take the country back”?

Uh ok…

You haven’t noticed that no one is engaging with your masturbation posts?

Why Banking Needs to Be Run as a Public Utility (1.5 hours - too long for the focus challenged)

It's our money; Dr Ellen Brown:
[link to itsourmoney.podbean.com (secure)]

The Open Money projects: [link to openmoney.org (secure)]

Language, Money and Wealth Acknowledgment

[link to eric.harris-braun.com (secure)]

Search string: Sheldon Emory "Billions for the bankers, Debts for the people"

[link to duckduckgo.com (secure)]

Search string: David Astle "Babylonian Woe"

[link to duckduckgo.com (secure)]

Wright Patman primer on money:

[link to duckduckgo.com (secure)]

Time bank digital currency on the blockchain. The URL may or may not be safe; I am looking at this 25 page pdf whitepaper now:

Time Bank digital currency; 25 page white paper:

[link to tnb.fund (secure)]

About 2001 Professor Auriti of Italy posed the questions of how value is inducted to money and thereafter who is the owner? (Easily found by search)

But prior to that by one hundred years the founders of the Austrian school of economics were debating a related question. This question is sort of "Which came first - the chicken or the egg?" and no clear conclusion ever appeared.

Ludwig von Mises on Credit and Money:
[link to www.mises.ch (secure)]

Take the time to read it; its only 300 pages.

Up to the last 2-3 years searching for certain topics was easy and got accurate results. But you all already know that...

G Edward Griffin in his book THE CREATURE FROM JEKYLL ISLAND put in chapter ten how double entry bookkeeping money is created. The chapter is titled THE MANDRAKE MECHANISM.

Search for yourself, or go to this link:

[link to blog.hasslberger.com]

The Great Pirates

by Flemming Funch, 7 December 1994.
In his book "Operating Manual for Spaceship Earth", in the chapter "Origins of Specialization", Buckminster Fuller tells the story about what he calls "The Great Pirates". This is my greatly shortened version of it:

[link to www.worldtrans.org]