Cant we disprove Flat Earth every time then sun sets?

NOPE

The Sun is moving. We, on the flat Earth, are not.

Yes, you are right. Flatties can't explain how the Sun lights up clouds from underneath during sunrises and sunsets.
They also can't explain how the Sun rises due East for all observers on the equinoxes. Or how people can look South from South America, Africa, and South America and all see the same stars. Or how stars rotate around the North and South celestial poles.

Why explain air to a fool who doubts it's there?

You only drag yourself down to the fools level.

Fuck em".
Let them live in willful stupidity.

fe sun is like a flashlight. a light source with a reflector to direct the sunlight. this is why it can illuminate certain parts of the earths surface and not others.

but in order to have the sun rise in the am and set in the evening it must articulate in a particular way.

i think its all done using a block and tackle set-up. God hoists the sun reflector up in the morn and lowers it in the evening.

he turns the wattage of the sun reflector down in the winter so the snow doesn't melt. this also saves on battery power.

the batteries used to be changed out by the shuttle crew, but now that the shuttle doesnt fly anymore it is done by aliens.

we have a multi year contract with them to do this.

When you figure out how to make sense of mentally ill people let us know.

That's ironic coming from somebody who thinks they're falling backwards at 1000 miles per hour when watching a sunset.

it does not disprove the 21 sided dice theory, or the multiple various other "sided dice" theories.

Sunsets to me look like the sun moving away and the sunlight following it.


I don't see a "terminator line" in the sky in other words real life sunlight doesn't behave like it does in NASA footage.

Furthermore the amount of time sunlight is visible in summer vs the winter proves to me that the sun is actually much closer and smaller than what they say.

Hear me out.

The sun "sets" but you see sunlight for hours after, why is that? Living on a ball in most places ( even accounting for the "tilt of the earth " should get exactly 12 hours exposure of daylight and night each 24 hour rotation, yet in many places you can see sunlight for up to 16 hours and longer, why?

You should start looking at things in a different perspective if you genuinely want to question the paradigm.

Actually all those things are explained.


You just aren't happy with the explanation, it's ok though.


I'm not happy with scientific hand waving explanation's either.

Like why doesn't the immense gravity of the massive sun pull in the smaller surrounding planets? Oh that's right because the gravity's magically "cancel each other out".


Yea ok.

obviously all bodies are pilotted by an invisible possibly intelligently created force.

and you prove that you don't understand the subject you argue against. The tilt DOES explain why you get sunlight for longer or shorter periods.

The moon is the past, the sun is the future

With the ball Earth theory clouds would be curved by gravity just like the water and the atmosphere, sun light would not be able to get under the clouds, sunlight under the clouds is a flat Earth phenomenon.

stop thinking you'll hurt yourself

Don't judge others by your own standards.

.

No it doesn't.


Real life sun and sunlight exposure doesn't match ISS footage.


Get a flashlight and a ball and you can't replicate the sun exposure we see daily.


Even with the tilt.

Sorry it's wrong.

Not only that but the gravity of the earth would not allow clouds to float above us, they would be constantly pulled down.

The sun moves, we don't.

Think of the yin yang picture.

Sun and Moon are rotating a-round us.

One thing for sure, we are not flying through infinite space at 69,000 MPH

Explain the midnight sun in Antarctica.

.

Right - that's called "rain" (or "snow" in winter).

.

Nope. The ball and tilt perfectly explain it. I said NOTHING about ISS footage.