Kamala Harris is NOT a Natural Born Citizen and is ineligible to be VP | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 53997967 United States 08/11/2020 11:18 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | That is NOT the only requirement according to the Constitution. The parents have to be citizens also and there is a residency requirement. I understand Democrats ar completely lawless people, but we have to FIGHT THIS TREND at disregarding the LAW. There is a REASON the Founders put these requirements in and it's because they wanted to ensure maximum loyalty to the US and minimum connection to other countries. It was a WISE thing to do. Chapter and verse please. Where in the Constitution does it define a residency requirement? If you think they intended to great citizenship to tourists, you are either stupid, insane or a Dem, which is both. Answer the question please. |
Kpduties User ID: 77774101 United States 08/11/2020 11:20 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
~Sloane~
User ID: 79185887 United States 08/11/2020 11:20 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 75571547 United States 08/11/2020 11:20 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Blue State Rebel That is NOT the only requirement according to the Constitution. The parents have to be citizens also and there is a residency requirement. I understand Democrats ar completely lawless people, but we have to FIGHT THIS TREND at disregarding the LAW. There is a REASON the Founders put these requirements in and it's because they wanted to ensure maximum loyalty to the US and minimum connection to other countries. It was a WISE thing to do. Chapter and verse please. Where in the Constitution does it define a residency requirement? If you think they intended to great citizenship to tourists, you are either stupid, insane or a Dem, which is both. Answer the question please. Must have lived in the US for at least 14 years is what it says. |
Sharon Cherries
User ID: 76983028 France 08/11/2020 11:20 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 77613522 She’s a GIFT to the GOP. She’s a train wreck and as unlikable now as she was in the primary. Don't kid yourself, she was Biden's smartest choice. How so? On paper they all had the qualifications - but Kamala is the most fierce. She has no fear. As a presidental candidate she was heavily *vetted*, so I don't expect we'll see any skeletons in her closet. She has the most charisma of all the women who were in the running. And she is by far the best debater. But we'll see. I'm just being objective here. Oh ok, I see where you’re coming from then. That’s true she is fierce. I thought she was the worst because she’s so phony and people didn’t vote for her in the primaries. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 75571547 United States 08/11/2020 11:21 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 74058095 United States 08/11/2020 11:21 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Perhaps you’ve never heard of jus soli citizenship Quoting: Anonymous Coward 78751774 You are born in u.s. you automatically get citizenship she was born in Oakland CA end of story Nope. Both parents have to be US Citizens at the time of her birth. One came here in 1961 and the other in 1963 and neither were here the full five years when Kamala was born in 1964. Trump's got both Biden and Harris where he wants them. Everyone needs to inform Trump and Bill Barr. The Democrat ticket is hereby invalidated and Trump wins 2020 by default. You're wrong OP. You are a citizen if you are either born on US soil or if either one of your parents are a citizen at time of birth. Anything else you've been told is simply wrong. Look it up...it's easy. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 75571547 United States 08/11/2020 11:22 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Perhaps you’ve never heard of jus soli citizenship Quoting: Anonymous Coward 78751774 You are born in u.s. you automatically get citizenship she was born in Oakland CA end of story Nope. Both parents have to be US Citizens at the time of her birth. One came here in 1961 and the other in 1963 and neither were here the full five years when Kamala was born in 1964. Trump's got both Biden and Harris where he wants them. Everyone needs to inform Trump and Bill Barr. The Democrat ticket is hereby invalidated and Trump wins 2020 by default. You're wrong OP. You are a citizen if you are either born on US soil or if either one of your parents are a citizen at time of birth. Anything else you've been told is simply wrong. Look it up...it's easy. Natural Born Citizen = born to 2 American citizen parents. Citizen = American citizen. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 27945288 United States 08/11/2020 11:23 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 53997967 United States 08/11/2020 11:23 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 53997967 Chapter and verse please. Where in the Constitution does it define a residency requirement? If you think they intended to great citizenship to tourists, you are either stupid, insane or a Dem, which is both. Answer the question please. Must have lived in the US for at least 14 years is what it says. Thank you:) |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 78326493 United States 08/11/2020 11:24 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 77784512 United States 08/11/2020 11:24 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 71611133 United States 08/11/2020 11:25 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | This was hashed out when she ran for president. She was born in th USA, and is over the age to run for Predident. She is qualified to be VP. Any word otherwise us just more racist shit. Next Quoting: Kpduties 77774101 Nice try but wrong. I beg to differ. That is a weak sauce effort. The only people bringing their A game are the eligiblers. In fact, there are a few of us that I know could go on CNN and school the fuck out of the idiot talking heads. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 77784512 United States 08/11/2020 11:27 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | This was hashed out when she ran for president. She was born in th USA, and is over the age to run for Predident. She is qualified to be VP. Any word otherwise us just more racist shit. Next Quoting: Kpduties 77774101 Nice try but wrong. I beg to differ. That is a weak sauce effort. The only people bringing their A game are the eligiblers. In fact, there are a few of us that I know could go on CNN and school the fuck out of the idiot talking heads. Taken from a post earlier. Natural Born Citizen has only ever been mentioned 1 time in US law and it was in 1790. The act defined natural born citizen as someone born to 2 American citizen parents. Birthright by land wasn't a thing until 1868 and was not meant to apply to vagrants/illegal immigrants. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 71611133 United States 08/11/2020 11:28 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Geez people. Nobody is eligible. You had to be either a citizen or a natural born citizen (at the time) of the adoption of this constitution. I don't think anybody at that time is still alive. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 78326493 You got it backwards. Natural Born Citizen or US Citizen at the time the Constitution is adopted. ...and anybody who had 2 parents that were US Citizens at the time of their birth and were born in the US are eligible. That's probably at least a couple hundred million of us. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 71611133 United States 08/11/2020 11:29 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | This was hashed out when she ran for president. She was born in th USA, and is over the age to run for Predident. She is qualified to be VP. Any word otherwise us just more racist shit. Next Quoting: Kpduties 77774101 Nice try but wrong. I beg to differ. That is a weak sauce effort. The only people bringing their A game are the eligiblers. In fact, there are a few of us that I know could go on CNN and school the fuck out of the idiot talking heads. Taken from a post earlier. Natural Born Citizen has only ever been mentioned 1 time in US law and it was in 1790. The act defined natural born citizen as someone born to 2 American citizen parents. Birthright by land wasn't a thing until 1868 and was not meant to apply to vagrants/illegal immigrants. Wrong. Minor v. Happersett , 88 U.S. 162 (1875) This case concerned Mrs. Minor, an original suffragette, who in virtue of the 14th Amendment attempted to register to vote in the State of Missouri, and was refused because she was not a man. The Chief Justice of the Supreme Court in that year wrote the majority opinion, in which he stated: The Constitution does not in words say who shall be natural-born citizens. Resort must be had elsewhere to ascertain that. At common law, with the nomenclature of which the framers of the Constitution were familiar, it was never doubted that all children born in a country of parents who were its citizens became themselves, upon their birth, citizens also. These were natives or natural-born citizens, as distinguished from aliens or foreigners. Some authorities go further and include as citizens children born within the jurisdiction without reference to the citizenship of their parents. |
getup
User ID: 77155497 United States 08/11/2020 11:30 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | time to shut these fkrs down hardcore. Deport everyone. Democrats and republicans that dont play by the rules need to be dealt with. Last Edited by messagehalted on 08/11/2020 11:31 PM All my post are theatrical artistic writing . |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 77784512 United States 08/11/2020 11:30 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | I beg to differ. That is a weak sauce effort. The only people bringing their A game are the eligiblers. In fact, there are a few of us that I know could go on CNN and school the fuck out of the idiot talking heads. Taken from a post earlier. Natural Born Citizen has only ever been mentioned 1 time in US law and it was in 1790. The act defined natural born citizen as someone born to 2 American citizen parents. Birthright by land wasn't a thing until 1868 and was not meant to apply to vagrants/illegal immigrants. Wrong. Minor v. Happersett , 88 U.S. 162 (1875) This case concerned Mrs. Minor, an original suffragette, who in virtue of the 14th Amendment attempted to register to vote in the State of Missouri, and was refused because she was not a man. The Chief Justice of the Supreme Court in that year wrote the majority opinion, in which he stated: The Constitution does not in words say who shall be natural-born citizens. Resort must be had elsewhere to ascertain that. At common law, with the nomenclature of which the framers of the Constitution were familiar, it was never doubted that all children born in a country of parents who were its citizens became themselves, upon their birth, citizens also. These were natives or natural-born citizens, as distinguished from aliens or foreigners. Some authorities go further and include as citizens children born within the jurisdiction without reference to the citizenship of their parents. Her parents were US citizens when she was born dooky booty. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 56563724 United States 08/11/2020 11:31 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Kpduties User ID: 77774101 United States 08/11/2020 11:32 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | There is consensus among academics that those born on American soil, except children born to foreign ambassadors or to hostile soldiers on U.S. territory, both of whom owe allegiance to a different sovereign, are natural born citizens, or jus soli, regardless of parental citizenship status. In a 2008 article published by the Michigan Law Review, Lawrence Solum, Professor of Law at the University of Illinois, stated that "there is general agreement on the core of [the] meaning [of the Presidential Eligibility Clause]. Anyone born on American soil whose parents are citizens of the United States is a 'natural born citizen'".[94] In April 2010, Solum republished the same article as an online draft, in which he clarified his original statement so that it would not be misunderstood as excluding the children of one citizen parent. In a footnote he explained, "based on my reading of the historical sources, there is no credible case that a person born on American soil with one American parent was clearly not a 'natural born citizen'." He further extended natural born citizenship to all cases of jus soli as the "conventional view".[95] Although Solum stated elsewhere that the two-citizen-parents arguments were not "crazy", he believes "the much stronger argument suggests that if you were born on American soil that you would be considered a natural born citizen."[96] Ronald Rotunda, Professor of Law at Chapman University, has remarked "There's [sic] some people who say that both parents need to be citizens. That's never been the law."[97] |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 77784512 United States 08/11/2020 11:32 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 75565542 United States 08/11/2020 11:34 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | There is consensus among academics that those born on American soil, except children born to foreign ambassadors or to hostile soldiers on U.S. territory, both of whom owe allegiance to a different sovereign, are natural born citizens, or jus soli, regardless of parental citizenship status. Quoting: Kpduties 77774101 In a 2008 article published by the Michigan Law Review, Lawrence Solum, Professor of Law at the University of Illinois, stated that "there is general agreement on the core of [the] meaning [of the Presidential Eligibility Clause]. Anyone born on American soil whose parents are citizens of the United States is a 'natural born citizen'".[94] In April 2010, Solum republished the same article as an online draft, in which he clarified his original statement so that it would not be misunderstood as excluding the children of one citizen parent. In a footnote he explained, "based on my reading of the historical sources, there is no credible case that a person born on American soil with one American parent was clearly not a 'natural born citizen'." He further extended natural born citizenship to all cases of jus soli as the "conventional view".[95] Although Solum stated elsewhere that the two-citizen-parents arguments were not "crazy", he believes "the much stronger argument suggests that if you were born on American soil that you would be considered a natural born citizen."[96] Ronald Rotunda, Professor of Law at Chapman University, has remarked "There's [sic] some people who say that both parents need to be citizens. That's never been the law."[97] The science is not settled so try again. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 56563724 United States 08/11/2020 11:35 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | The Jamaican Constitution makes her automatically a Jamaican Citizen. Quoting: Anonymous Coward 56563724 That's a big problem since dual citizens can't be president. Unless you wear a small hat probably. She is a dual citizen: Specifically, Chapter 2 (entitled Citizenship) of the Jamaica Constitution, Section 3C states: Every person born outside Jamaica shall become a citizen of Jamaica - on the sixth day of August 1962, in the case of a person born before that date; or on the date of his/her birth, in the case of a person born on or after the sixth day of August 1962, if, at that date, his/her father or mother is a citizen of Jamaica by birth, descent, or registration by virtue of marriage to a citizen of Jamaica. |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 78222504 United States 08/11/2020 11:40 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Fuckin funny that if you freaks applied this same logic to trump he couldn’t be president LOL Quoting: Anonymous Coward 76979704 This is pure racism There is no such thing as race. Science is all over this but since 80% of all scientists are liberal lunatics its kept way off the MSM news queue. Liberals can't have it both ways. Calling climate change deniers science deniers but at the same time pulling the phony race card very time they need to break wind is pathetic. There is no race but only culture making racism a myth. Bigotry is merely cultural preference and that's all we really have left to maintain our cultural identities. [link to www.nationalgeographic.com (secure)] |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 71611133 United States 08/11/2020 11:41 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 71611133 I beg to differ. That is a weak sauce effort. The only people bringing their A game are the eligiblers. In fact, there are a few of us that I know could go on CNN and school the fuck out of the idiot talking heads. Taken from a post earlier. Natural Born Citizen has only ever been mentioned 1 time in US law and it was in 1790. The act defined natural born citizen as someone born to 2 American citizen parents. Birthright by land wasn't a thing until 1868 and was not meant to apply to vagrants/illegal immigrants. Wrong. Minor v. Happersett , 88 U.S. 162 (1875) This case concerned Mrs. Minor, an original suffragette, who in virtue of the 14th Amendment attempted to register to vote in the State of Missouri, and was refused because she was not a man. The Chief Justice of the Supreme Court in that year wrote the majority opinion, in which he stated: The Constitution does not in words say who shall be natural-born citizens. Resort must be had elsewhere to ascertain that. At common law, with the nomenclature of which the framers of the Constitution were familiar, it was never doubted that all children born in a country of parents who were its citizens became themselves, upon their birth, citizens also. These were natives or natural-born citizens, as distinguished from aliens or foreigners. Some authorities go further and include as citizens children born within the jurisdiction without reference to the citizenship of their parents. Her parents were US citizens when she was born dooky booty. Before I address her parents citizenship status, do you agree she is NOT eligible if they were not US Citizens at the time of her birth? |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 79255919 France 08/11/2020 11:45 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | So that was allowed. Obunghole is not a natural born citizen by any stretch of the imagination and actually went to university on a scholarship for foreigners. Nobody could get SCOTUS to hear the case as they lacked "standing". No state credentials committee leadership would follow the normal protocol and "due dilligence" to verify his records. It was a FARCE because he's partially BLACK. Must not even have a whiff of racism despite there being nothing racist about credential checking. So the American Republic had an uncredentially person run...who won by the popular vote and the electoral college. Damn the bad luck. So everything Obunghole was null and void as he was uncredentially and so unqualified to run, but imbeciles allowed it. Now they're allowing a pro-abortion, anti-Second Amendment, liar, whore, anchor baby run for the Vice Presidency. Why the fuck not? Now there is precident due to Obunghole. Imbeciles, cheats, traitors, bigots, liars, it goes on and on in the USA. Why would any decent people even run? |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 75565542 United States 08/11/2020 11:45 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 77784512 Taken from a post earlier. Natural Born Citizen has only ever been mentioned 1 time in US law and it was in 1790. The act defined natural born citizen as someone born to 2 American citizen parents. Birthright by land wasn't a thing until 1868 and was not meant to apply to vagrants/illegal immigrants. Wrong. Minor v. Happersett , 88 U.S. 162 (1875) This case concerned Mrs. Minor, an original suffragette, who in virtue of the 14th Amendment attempted to register to vote in the State of Missouri, and was refused because she was not a man. The Chief Justice of the Supreme Court in that year wrote the majority opinion, in which he stated: The Constitution does not in words say who shall be natural-born citizens. Resort must be had elsewhere to ascertain that. At common law, with the nomenclature of which the framers of the Constitution were familiar, it was never doubted that all children born in a country of parents who were its citizens became themselves, upon their birth, citizens also. These were natives or natural-born citizens, as distinguished from aliens or foreigners. Some authorities go further and include as citizens children born within the jurisdiction without reference to the citizenship of their parents. Her parents were US citizens when she was born dooky booty. Before I address her parents citizenship status, do you agree she is NOT eligible if they were not US Citizens at the time of her birth? Are you comparing former slaves to immigrants? |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 78525908 United States 08/11/2020 11:48 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | Perhaps you’ve never heard of jus soli citizenship Quoting: Anonymous Coward 78751774 You are born in u.s. you automatically get citizenship she was born in Oakland CA end of story Yep. Worst possible vp pic given the slide to the hard left of the democrats but good for trump. Still not 100% Biden is the nominee from the dems. Also we all new it was going to be her. Wiki page heavily edited 3-4 weeks ago, fresh plastic surgery last week it was all the tale tale signs. MAGA 2020 bitches |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 73711039 United States 08/11/2020 11:49 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | |
Anonymous Coward User ID: 71611133 United States 08/11/2020 11:50 PM Report Abusive Post Report Copyright Violation | ... Quoting: Anonymous Coward 71611133 Wrong. Minor v. Happersett , 88 U.S. 162 (1875) This case concerned Mrs. Minor, an original suffragette, who in virtue of the 14th Amendment attempted to register to vote in the State of Missouri, and was refused because she was not a man. The Chief Justice of the Supreme Court in that year wrote the majority opinion, in which he stated: The Constitution does not in words say who shall be natural-born citizens. Resort must be had elsewhere to ascertain that. At common law, with the nomenclature of which the framers of the Constitution were familiar, it was never doubted that all children born in a country of parents who were its citizens became themselves, upon their birth, citizens also. These were natives or natural-born citizens, as distinguished from aliens or foreigners. Some authorities go further and include as citizens children born within the jurisdiction without reference to the citizenship of their parents. Her parents were US citizens when she was born dooky booty. Before I address her parents citizenship status, do you agree she is NOT eligible if they were not US Citizens at the time of her birth? Are you comparing former slaves to immigrants? Did you just call Kamala Harris a stanky ho? |