Kamala Harris is NOT a Natural Born Citizen and is ineligible to be VP

Jesus is coming soon and Man oh Man is he pissed off. America is fucking Babylon and elects Luciferians.

Not natural born. Has to be born of 2 citizen parents in country of their citizenship. One was Jamaican. The other from India.
Obama was ineligible too. But Pelosi let it slide.

Last Edited by NightWisp on 08/11/2020 11:52 PM

The funny thing is that is one of the better arguments presented in defense of her eligibility.

They don't even try, probably because the issue is just too complicated for them.

Any Christian voting for people who tear apart babies and take away the natural right to own and bear arms is Hell bound.

You are going to burn in HELL.

You're a very racist individual for implying immigrants are the same as slaves after everything the slaves endured.

It's also very ignorant to compare a group of people that lived on US soil for generations to somebody that just poops out a kid on US soil.

is the law still relevant

Got awfully quiet in here.

wasnt she born in the same village as Obama???

The USA should just be nuked into an ash heap.

HOW DARE YOU call Kamala a stanky ho you racist, misogynist, strong wamyn hating BIGOT

Didnt stop the senator from Kenya

Couldn't have been. Only 1 idiot per village allowed.

Also the citizenship laws are very clear. An alien must live in the country for 5 years with a green card before even applying for citizenship.

Any child born in that time will be born a citizen just not a natural born citizens. which means they can do everything except run for vp or president.

You're embarrassing yourself.

That's because one side has done a shit ton of research, has SCOTUS decisions supporting their argument, has historical letters from John Jay, Alexander Hamilton written to George Washington that support their argument, can cite a contemporary source for the definition they are using that was influential in the drafting of the Constitution that supports their argument and the other side has one sentence rebuttals with no links, court decision or sources that the Founding Fathers might have been influenced by.

It's not even a fair debate.

I'm just lowering myself to the level of the idiots who are desperate to change the subject because they got schooled on the topic at hand.

It's a fun break from trying to educate mental midgets.

I didn't want to say anything but.... ^this

This is the derpyest thing ever. She was born here. I think she’s terrible. But she’s eligible.

.

Well we are after 1868 now. Clearly you are saying that the various laws have changed. So what is the law now? No point trying to follow 1790 law or 1864 law. What is 2020 law?

And WHAT cereal box did YOU get your law degree from?

14th Amendment, MORAN!!!


.

The definition of who is a natural born citizen was never changed.

Only the definition of who is a citizen.

They're 2 different things.
Therefore the original definition would still apply.

is that yore opinion? or the supreme courts opinion?

Supreme Court will not rule on it.

Here is the SCOTUS opinion:

Minor v. Happersett , 88 U.S. 162 (1875)
This case concerned Mrs. Minor, an original suffragette, who in virtue of the 14th Amendment attempted to register to vote in the State of Missouri, and was refused because she was not a man. The Chief Justice of the Supreme Court in that year wrote the majority opinion, in which he stated:

The Constitution does not in words say who shall be natural-born citizens. Resort must be had elsewhere to ascertain that. At common law, with the nomenclature of which the framers of the Constitution were familiar, it was never doubted that all children born in a country of parents who were its citizens became themselves, upon their birth, citizens also. These were natives or natural-born citizens, as distinguished from aliens or foreigners. Some authorities go further and include as citizens children born within the jurisdiction without reference to the citizenship of their parents.

Clarence Thomas said as much, but if President TRUMP decides to challenge this, he has standing and the SCOTUS may be forced into a decision.

...which Roberts will probably screw up and side with the liberals.

Lets put it this way.
Not counting the presidents that qualified for exemptions due to date of birth.

There has only been 1 president that was not born to 2 American Citizens.

Barrack Hussein Obama.

Yes, we know, "laws are for peasants".