Top Mathematicians Challenge Darwin’s Theory of Evolution (Prove evolution is fucking impossible)

I can't be bothered sitting through their speil again. They're all dishonest pricks. Give me their best argument, and I'll refute it right now.

Not at all, he is simply summarizing the facts, only without bothering to list any particular examples.

There are many examples of the "sometimes very awkward and convoluted solutions to biological problems" he speaks of. Biological solutions that really make no sense, unless they're the result of mindless evolution. Such as blood vessels making a long detour to round a particular structure, suggesting evolution from an earlier form where this structure was positioned differently, so no such detour was needed. Plenty of similar structural examples of less-than-optimal design choices exists, and the same kind of signs of incompetent engineering exist on the molecular biology level too. If life was designed by a Creator, then the designer is shockingly incompetent on the most basic level, making logical mistakes that are obvious even to His designed creatures.

And the poster's observation that "only a complete sadistic monster would have come up with some of the creatures and parasitic lifestyles" is pretty spot on too. There is a distinct lack of morality in the design of living beings. Biological life is brutally self centered and indifferent to the suffering of other creatures, and if it was actually designed to be so, then that wouldn't speak highly of the morality of its designer.

So, unless you propose a Creator that is both a shoddy engineer, and completely immoral and indifferent to the suffering of His created being, I guess the theory of evolution explains the observed facts better.

Scientism is a cult aimed at disproving god, that is why all their theories revolve around chaos. Its a different form of devil worship, they place facts in theory and brainwash the masses into believing in them.

Amazing. You've somehow managed to maintain the mentality of a medieval peasant, afraid of science, despite the fact you're on the internet.

Inter-species evolution, yes. Evolution as how life was created, no.

I know you're too smart to understand this, but you are every bit as religious as I am. Your'god' just happens to be science. The problem is you'll never be able to prove my religion to be false by simply ignoring the reality that nothing can not explode into something the size of your ever expanding universe for no reason, there is no proof of one animal changing into another (beyond imagining certain parts to be left over from the magical change), and there are such things as mathematical impossibility (No matter how much you wish there wasn't). Thinking yourself wise, you became a fool.

EVOLUTION DOES NOT -NOR HAS IT EVER- ATTEMPTED TO EXPLAIN THE ORIGIN OF LIFE.

That's not what the theory is about. Atomic theory doesn't explain where atoms came from. Germ theory doesn't explain where germs came from.

Stop making this redundant point.

Simply saying that no creator would create certain life forms is not a fact. It's just a feeling. That's just one of many examples from that post. Understanding that fact, you can find the rest of them yourself.

Nope, not religious. You have to butcher the english language to even suggest such a thing. You ignore reality, and cherry pick the opinions of a few clowns that you don't even understand.

Any odds higher than zero are not a mathematical impossibility. But no Creationist has the data necessary to accurately determine the odds of abiogenesis.

Evolution is the inevitable continuation of the big bang theory. Stop pretending they are exclusive.

Let me guess: they're all teaching at some catholic or, at the very least, heavily religiotically funded institutions ... mental institutions ...

Essentially semantics... You responded before saying "Scientific community" as a source of truth. The Scientific community push for the Big Bang Theory as the source of life and Evolution Theory for the changes that the life form goes through up until all creation on Earth today. Both Theories go hand in hand.

This is a discussion. It is rather interesting when people say, "stop" or "don't say..." Let's discuss this.

A lizard did not come from a fish.
A cat, did not from a dog.
A human did not evolve from an ape.

Evolution did not create species.

Last Edited by 2012Portal on 08/20/2020 04:43 AM

Your 'god' is that which rules over and guides you. That is the perfect use of the language. Again, you are just doing anything you can to hold on to your infantile religion. That's just more proof that it's false. If it were real, you wouldn't have to use deception to prove it.

The big bang theory was created by a priest over 20 years after the origin of species was written. It is factually not a part of evolution theory.

You seem to think that the entire scientific consensus in any field equals evolution theory. This is retarded. Did you get that from Kent hovind?

Nope. Big bang has nothing to do with the origins of life. This is honestly sad. You would know these hings if you spent 10 minutes researching, but it seems all your information comes from Creationist con artists.

You're confused. I haven't used any deception, and you are the one ignoring all of the data to hold onto your religion. Many Christians accept evolution.

I hate to tell you this, but those theories have been around for thousands of years. Darwin and the priest did not invent them. You might be shocked to learn that Edison didn't invent the light bulb, as well. Strange how that happens.

Defend your deity with whatever denial you must, but defend him you shall....

It all boils down to this.

Scientific theories (Big Bang, Evolution);

A series of mistakes and mishaps that has no source or meaning created a world within countless universes and infinite space. On this world many forms of life exist from Bacteria to Blue Whales. Humans are also there. There is no morality, it is a figment of someones imagination. Rules and laws are also just pure imagination, and there is absolutely no reason for every person on Earth to just do as they please. Kill someone? That is just survival of the fittest. Slavery, again exploiting and using resources to ensure an easier way to survive. Stealing, again just trying to survive.

Creationist

An Intelligent Designer who we know as God has poured his time and effort into meticulously designing the entire world and all life into it. He lays down several Laws and Rules for all creation. Animals have instincts to survive and Humans too, but Humans have rules that go one further, they have Laws to ensure equality and fairness that provide a strong foundation of morality for all decisions and behaviours. These laws ensure health and vitality for all and straying from these result in nothing but bad.

Denying your deception doesn't make it go away and of course many won claim to be Christian accept your false religion. The path is very narrow and few will be able to stay on it.

Even if there is some kind of a process of "evolution", it simply can't be RANDOM. It's like saying throwing a bunch of letters on the floor will at one point (after a billion attempts, or so) create a short story, or novel. No, it won't. Chaos doesn't create order by itself. You know that a car is not a random collection of minerals, right? So why would you believe a living organism is a random collection of molecules? Adaptation to changing environmental conditions requires awareness and intelligence.

Ok, Loony toons. Have fun talking to yourself. I'll continue to form my opinions based on genetic analysis and the fossil record.

Thank you. You have fun searching for truth in a pile of dusty bones and rocks, while ignoring the very simple explanations that prove your time is wasted.

If you hate to say it, here's an idea. Don't. Or you know, give me evidence. Regardless, the age of the theory has no impact on the present day evidence, which is what I base my opinion on.

I'd take that more seriously if I thought you knew how proof works.

Accusing someone of deception doesn't make it so. Put up or shut up you preachy fool.

Big bang and evolution are the same thing. Split into two parts to make it easier for you to defend in your own mind. Look at all the "evidence" you can get your hands on, but you will never be able to answer the simple questions that completely destroy your theories. You'll be haunted by the thought that you are wrong for the rest of your life.

Just another feeble attempt at reassuring yourself that you are correct.

Simple. Evolution is not random. Mutations appear to be, as does the genetic shuffling during meiosis, but that doesn't mean that babies are created 'randomly.'