The Shooting of Rayshard Brooks was Justified...New Video

Muh Infinite Debt to Infinituh is Patriotica!

Fucking idiots.

You're seen, bro.

Watch what happens next.

:)

Muh antiiiiiseeeeeeemitismZ™

:)


Seen

Burning yer memes down to ash now.

Ouch.

You're a disgusting racist.

HurtZ™ donnit?

LOL

PEOPLE are catching on

and you know it

and it enrages you.

:)

We're laughing at your rage.

please defend Infinite Debt to Infinity™




Last Edited by SyncAsFunk on 06/14/2020 03:44 AM

You'll be banned soon.

count on it.

;)

You're in my chair.

Yes, right, he fired it and missed

SO what?

The officer was in no danger unless he tried to chase him down and shoot him at close range ,like he did. A backshooter is a special kind of scum.

I flip scripts professionally.

Nothing personal.

It's simply business.

:)

Because that is all they need to see,they already have the entitlement and US v's Them mentality

AS long as YOU understand.

And I know you understand.

:)

Guy got shot in the back and killed for falling asleep in a drive through

Thats what it boils down to.

You have to remeber, verything that happened after the police got there would not have happened had they not behaved in the manner thye did. There is a legal principal that applies to criminal justice that if a persons actions cause another to commit a crime, the one who did so is guilty of that crime while to one compelled to do against their will is innocent.

In other words if you light a guy up with a taser he is going to most like fight if he can, quite vigorously. It is EXTREMELY painful and unpleasant. It all comes down to was the level of force reasonable for a man suspected of falling asleep in line at wendys.
Drunk or not thats the complaint they came on. Everything else is a jack up

Trump sucks the dingleberries off of Putins asshair.

HLF, can you PM me with a way to contact you? I don't have a paid membership any longer. I have a great meme but can't upload it due to not having a paid membership. And I can't PM you for the same reason.

You're incorrect.

Cops and their lawyers have argued again and again that a taser is non-lethal force. Court case after court case when alleged perpetrators have died, police have escaped responsibility because tasers are non-lethal weapons.

Cops getting certified to carry a taser are shot with a taser as part of the process. Because it's non-lethal.

That means that when a suspect pointed a non-lethal weapon and even shot a non-lethal weapon at the cop (who had to have been certified to carry a taser because he was carrying one) that cop knew he was dealing with established non-lethal force.

And unlawfully responded with deadly force against a fleeing suspect who was shot repeatedly in the back and killed.

A cop can't reasonably declare a taser non-lethal while also claiming a taser made them fear for their life. A cop not in fear of losing their life has no legal justification for repeatedly shooting a fleeing suspect.

I know you understand.

Guess who else understands?

:)

The dead man fired the taser at the cop and missed by a country mile, then the pig opened fire.

The reason the shot him is because the black guy body punched him in the face and body slammed him while he was being tasered. You can see the cop flip over backwards during the scuffle that is partially obscured by a car. The killer cop also ran into a parked car while running and firing at the guy. SHot the fucker in the back.I'm not shooting a fucker if he is running away from me, Thats what he needs to be doing

You suck cock, Vladimir.

You and yours are behind Ze curve. Let's just say that there's a new Sheriff in town, and this dude cuts through all the idiot mustard.

LOL

Oh, a taser can fire more than once but only if reloaded. You cannot do that while running, even if you had another cartridge.
It is a contact only device after being fired, you have to touch them with the actual taser to shokc them.

Boy that went south, didnt it vlad?

Fucking bloodsucker

They can and will claim that a suspect can tase a cop in order to gain control of his sidearm which justifies lethal force.

 

if'n you ain't laughin, you ain't payin attention.


[link to www.youtube.com (secure)]

You're correct. That's almost certainly why he REALLY shot him. But he can't say in court that he shot him to remedy a spiteful 2-second grudge resulting from his own physical weakness. The cop will claim "feared for my life," because that's generally the golden "get out of jail free" card.

But not this time. Because his own certified training will validate that tasers are recognized as non-lethal and that he knew it.